The Supreme Court ruled in A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (AIR 1970 SC A) that a person who serves on a committee that selects candidates for a job must not be a candidate for the job himself. The logic is that the judges could be impartial and neutral.
Category: Law Notes
Rajkishore Purohit v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2017)
According to the Court, ‘Common intention’ means ‘state of mind’. It can’t be read objectively. The Supreme Court said that the order of acquittal which was passed by the HC was based on speculation.
Arjun Pawar vs State of Maharashtra |Case Analysis
The assault took place after the election. The hatred would be the only reason for the crime. Though Khandusing won the election he was having anger towards Shriram.
The Ajmal Kasab Case |Case Analysis
The death penalty was given to the appellant Ajmal Kasab by the Trial Court. But Kasab challenged this judgment in the HC. But HC didn’t accept the plea of Kasab and supported the judgment of the Trial Court of the death penalty.
Offences Against the State Under IPC
Chapter VI of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, deals with crimes against the state (Section 121 to Section 130). The goal of these rules is to maintain the overall safety of the state.
Offences Relating to Religion Under IPC |Law Notes
Our Constitution guarantees religious freedom under Articles 25 and 30. Because of the vastness of India and the diversity of religious customs, the Macaulay panel felt compelled to include religious offences in the Indian Penal Code of 1860. All of the provisions are laid forth in Chapter XV, and they are expounded on in sections 295-298.
Difference between Murder and Culpable Homicide |Law Notes |IPC
The difference between murder and culpable homicide is intention. If the intention is present the crime is said to be committed under Section 300 of IPC.
Economic growth vs Environmental Conservation
The issue of economic growth and the environment essentially concerns that the kind of pressure that economic growth has at the national and the international level places on the environment over time.
Sony Pictures Network India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. sportsala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 289/2021 SONY PICTURES NETWORK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .
Surendra Trading Company vs Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills
As we all know IBC is just a 5-time old provision and from time to time colourful emendations and judgment give it a shape. The present judgment bandied is an important judgment as it bandied the pivotal provision of IBC.
The Coca-Cola Company vs Bisleri International Pvt. Ltd.
The plaintiff (Coca Cola Company) purchased and acquired the rights to formulate, intellectual property rights and goodwill attached to the
Canara bank vs Canara sales corporation case |Explained!
After the nationalisation of the said bank, the Canara Bank has been brought on record as the appellant. The suit was instituted for and on behalf of the Canara
The “Bajaj Auto – TVS Motors” patent controversy
A suit was brought up by the Bajaj Auto Limited before the Single bench of Madras High Court regarding infringement of its patent No.195904
Scope of Imposing Joint Liability under Indian Penal Code
Under this section the person should be jointly liable for the commission of the act by several persons to commit the criminal act in
Criminal Conspiracy & Joint Liability Under IPC |Law Notes!
The nature and scope of Criminal Conspiracy, joint liability and common intention are explained in this article, law notes for the law, UPSC students.
Case Brief – R vs. Clarke – Law Notes
R v. Clarke, [1927] 40 CLR 227 Parties: Evan Clarke, Plaintiff The Crown, Defendant Introduction The case deals with the topic, Communication of offer and Acceptance. According to Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, the communication of the offer is complete when it comes to the awareness…