The Right to Life, of course, cannot be upheld if every person is not given access to proper health and medical assistance. It is the most primary prerequisite to living a full life.
The constitutional principles of equality and liberty have been upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the Vishaka Judgement.
The plaintiff, Pushpalatha N.V., filed an appeal against a decree by the trial court claiming a one-fifth part of the properties in the suit against one-twentieth part held by the trial court in A, B and E schedule properties, as C and D were misplaced under the Land Reforms Act.
The Aadhaar card includes a unique number that works as an identity proof and as an address proof in India. Earlier there were numerous cards to enjoy government subsidies, and benefits like driver’s license, voter ID, ration card which is now replaced by a single Aadhaar card.
Carlill vs. Carbolic the Smoke Ball case addressed whether an advertising company gimmick can be considered an express contractual promise to pay. Because the contract was made unilaterally, acceptance can be made without formal communication.
The overall goal of the BALCO decision is to protect the future from previous incorrect and anachronistic rulings, as well as to encourage Indian courts to become more arbitration-friendly and thus less likely to participate in the arbitral phase, in accordance with the fundamental theory and ethos of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Rule.
The court placed emphasis and provided a clear explanation of how it recognizes the parties’ arbitration agreement. This article is a case study of the same case that discusses each aspect in detail with critical analysis.
The judgment appears to clear up any confusion regarding the standards for granting interim protection under the Arbitration Act, particularly regarding whether the CPC 1908’s applicable level must be met before interim protection under the Arbitration Act is granted.
Background ‘Essentials conditions for granting maintenance include the following points”: Facts of the Case Three boys and two daughters were born to Mohd Ahmed Khan (the appealing party), a lawyer…
The decision distinguished between International Commercial Arbitration and Domestic Arbitration by putting them to the test of nationality and domicile.
The Sole Arbitrator was absent on one of the specified occasions, making it impossible for him to conduct the proceedings.
The case of Managing Director ECIL v. B. Karunakar, heard by the Supreme Court of India in 1993, concerned the dismissal of an employee of Electronics Corporation of India Limited (ECIL). The case involved issues of natural justice, disciplinary proceedings, and the scope of the Public Servant (Inquiries) Act, 1850.