“Marriage Shouldn’t Be a Shield: The Constitutional Struggle Against Marital Rape
However, it appears that married women are not included under the term ‘person’, as their right to live with dignity is no longer valued.
MAKING LAW SIMPLE!
However, it appears that married women are not included under the term ‘person’, as their right to live with dignity is no longer valued.
It must be taken into account that this right is in addition to the remedy that has been provided under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act 2019, which specifies clearly that a woman
We definitely ought to note here that as the Jharkhand High Court while granting bail failed to assign any reasons and so the Apex Court remitted the matter to the Jharkhand High Court for fresh consideration of this bail case.
It must be noted that the Single Judge Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Dr SN Pathak hastened to add that though the police official was acquitted in the rape case lodged by this live-in partner, it cannot be a ground for quashing his dismissal from service.
Single Judge Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul who authored this notable judgment clearly held that for a Talaak pronouncement to be valid, there are several accompanying acts to be carried out, including
We need to note that a petition had been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to quash the impugned FIR that had been registered against a ‘self-proclaimed’ student leader of a school.
It would be imperative to note that the Delhi High Court made the observations while refusing to quash an FIR that was registered under Section 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Centre had just no business to deny West UP even a single High Court Bench knowing fully well the ground reality and then passing the buck to the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh or Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court or Governor of Uttar Pradesh
The Apex Court underscored that portrayals which carry negative stereotypes about persons with disabilities would impact their dignity and perpetuate social discrimination against them.
The investigating agency cannot be permitted to continuously peep into the private life of the accused enlarged on bail, by imposing arbitrary conditions since that will violate the right of privacy of the accused, as guaranteed by Article 21.
Courts have “ample power” to release the first offender of minor offences on probation, keeping into focus the nature and manner of the crime, age of the offender, other antecedents and so also the attending circumstances of the offence, instead of committing him to jail.
So it is mandatory that there should be a proper certificate also as held by the Delhi High Court in this leading case for whatsapp conversations to be read as evidence.
The preamble to the Act says that it is an Act “to define and amend certain parts of the law relating to contract”.
The RMLNLU Law Review runs parallel to the RMLNLU Law Journal on CMET (Communications, Media, Entertainment, and Technology).
Chapter IX addresses offences concerning elections. Chapter X establishes provisions against offences involving coins, currency notes, bank notes.
In contrast to the IPC, which encompasses 23 Chapters housing 511 Sections along with all amendments, the BNS is designed to be more concise, comprising 20 Chapters housing 358 Sections.