Introduction The instant case falls under the ambit of Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act. The features of the said Act are as follows- The main idea behind this rule is to reinforce the right provided by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. It is to forbid any act…
Category: Case Brief
Ramdayal vs Maji Devdiji: Case Analysis
Citations: AIR 1956 Raj 12 Bench: Wanchoo, Modi FACTS In this case, there were money dealings between the plaintiff and the defendant, and the latter went into accounts and struck a balance of Rs. 3000/- in plaintiffs. Thereafter, the defendant took a further loan of Rs. 7000/- from the plaintiff…
State of Punjab vs Gurmit Singh
Citations: 1996 AIR 1393, 1996 SCC (2) 384 Bench: Anand, A.S. (J) FACTS OF THE CASE: The prosecutrix was a young girl below the age of 16 yrs. who was studying in the 10th class? On 30th March 1984, while she was going to her maternal uncle, a car was…
Bengal Coal Co. Ltd. vs The Union Of India: Case Analysis
Equivalent citations: AIR 1971 Cal 219 Bench: S Chakravarti, S Datta FACTS In this case, the plaintiff supplied a certain quantity of coal to the Union Of India. The plaintiff claimed a sum of Rs. 10,901alleged to be due for the supply of coal together with a sum of Rs. 6540…
The Managing Director vs. Deepti Singh
This is a case law analysis on the case The Managing Director, Kerala Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. v. Deepti Singh and Ors. and it talks about the facts and the judgement of the case. 1. FACTS OF THE CASE This case has been filed as an appeal against the initial…
Novartis AG vs Union Of India & Ors
The case of Novartis AG v. Union of India, decided by a two-judge panel of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, is one of India’s landmark decisions.
Lily Thomas Etc. vs Union Of India & Ors.
Smt. Sushmita Ghosh, the wife of Shri G.C. Ghosh (Mohd. Karim Ghazi), filed a Writ Petition in this Court, claiming that she married Shri G.C. Ghosh in accordance with Hindu rituals on May 10, 1984, and that they have been living peacefully in Delhi since then.
Rural Litigation And Entitlement Kendra & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Ors
At the same time as the Supreme Court took up the case, the Central Government became concerned about the Valley’s important mining activities. In the year 1983,
Shah Bano Begum Case |Explained! |Mohammed Ahmed vs Shah Bano and Anr.
The Shah Bano ruling drew a lot of criticism, with authority entities opposing the decision since it violated Islamic law requirements. However, the Supreme Court issued an unbiased judgment, restoring residents’ confidence and faith in the court.
D.K. Basu, Ashok K. Johri vs. State of West Bengal
D.K. Basu, Ashok K. Johri v. Province of West Bengal is a flawless pearl that filled in as a suggestion to the State of its obligation to defend the privileges, everything being equal, even the individuals who are captured or imprisoned.
People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India
Telephone tapping is an infringement on one of an individual’s most cherished possessions: privacy. The right to have a private telephonic conversation in the seclusion of one’s home or business, due to the rising development of extremely sophisticated technology, is susceptible to misuse.
Rameshwar Prasad & Ors vs. Union of India & Anr.
The Bihar Assembly Dissolution Case, also known as Rameshwar Prasad vs. Union of India, is a one-of-a-kind case that largely relates to the subject of Election Law and has opened the way for a more fair and transparent election process in India.
M.C. Mehta vs Kamal Nath |Explained!
In this example, the Supreme Court utilized the ‘Regulation of Public Trust.’ The hypothesis of public trust is an old lawful thought that states that some normal products, like streams, beaches, backwoods, and the air, are held in trust by the public authority for the overall population’s free and unlimited use.
Narmada Bachao Andolan vs Union of India & Ors.
The damming of the Narmada has been loaded with discussion and extended political moving. It’s anything but an antagonistic subject, and nobody can absolutely state which side of the contention is the most fitting.
People’s Union For Civil Liberties vs Union of India
Phone tapping is a penetrate of one of a person’s most prized resources, in particular security. Because of the quick headway of incredibly modern innovation, the option to have a continuous call in the protection of one’s home or business is ready for misuse.
U.P. Pollution Control Board v. Modi Distillery and Others
The term “environment” is most commonly used to describe a “natural” situation, and it refers to the whole of all living and non-living objects that make up a life form, or a group of life forms. The term “environment” refers to all of the elements, factors, and circumstances that influence the growth and development of a particular creature.
