Category: Case Brief

Case Brief, Law Notes

Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh 

Unni Krishnan’s case was fundamental as far as the Right to Education since it raised the issue of the “Right to life” inside the ambit of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which gives everyone the right to schooling. Financial assets’ inclusion in restricting this right, just as the connection between Fundamental Rights and the Constitution’s Directive Principles.

Case Brief, Law Notes

SR Bommoi vs Union of India: Case Brief

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Background In 1989, when Shri S.R. Bommai was coordinating the Janata Dal organization in Karnataka, various individuals quit the gathering and started an issue blemish…

Case Brief, Law Notes

Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug v. Union of India

All Indian people have the right to life, according to the country’s constitution. The never-ending controversy over whether this provision can be construed to include the right to die still lingers in the air. On the other hand, with a growing emphasis in the medical industry on patients’ informed consent, the concept of euthanasia has gotten a mixed response in India.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. Union of India

The Indian Constitution is a social service document that has an organized and precise expression of economic rights based on directive principles. The parliament’s welfare rules promise to make socioeconomic resources more accessible to the general public and disadvantaged groups.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Chander Sen

The late Rangi Lal and his child, Chander Sen, were individuals from a Hindu unified family, as indicated by custom. They claimed some land and worked an organization under the name Khushi Ram Rangi Lal, which they acquired from their dad.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India

To address this issue, India’s first Backward Classes Commission, known as the Kalelkar Commission after its chairman, Kaka Kalelkar, was established. The panel was established by Presidential Order under Article 304(2) of the Indian Constitution. On January 29, 1953, the company was founded.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Mrs. Mary Roy vs. the State of Kerala

This case is one of the landmark decisions taken by the Honorable Supreme Court of India. It deals with giving a Christian woman the inheritance law rights of their parents. It was upheld for the first time and overturned by the Travancore Succession Act of 1916, which applied to the Travancore region of Kerala.

Case Brief, Law Notes

K.V. Narayana v. K.V. Ranganathan, AIR 1976

Kota Venkatachala Pathy, the respondents in this, and Kota Narayanan, the litigant thus, were certifiable siblings, being the children of one Kota Rangaswami Chettiar. They made an exchanging family with their cousin Subramanyam Chettiar, the child of Kota Kuppuswami Chettiar and sibling of Kota Rangaswami Chettiar. Subramanyam Chettiar was the family’s chief and karta before 1927.

Case Brief, Law Notes

AP Pollution Control Board vs Prof.MVNayudu (Retd.)

Drinking water is essential for all living creatures. All people, regardless of their stage of development or social and economic level, have the right to the same amount of drinking water and basic requirements, according to a United Nations resolution adopted at the 1977 Water Conference.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Raj Narain Singh v. Chairman Patna Administration committee

An executive authority may make changes to existing or future laws, but not to any essential feature. Because a portion of an Act can be extended, a section or sections can also be selected and applied.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Ankita Sinha

It is, within the end, critical to shop the surroundings from all of the risky pollutants and different factors that have an effect on the united states of America as well. 

Case Brief, Law Notes

Case Brief |Rajasthan State Electricity vs Dayal WoodWork

A Tender is a legal offer or proposal to do or abstain from doing an act and it binds the party to perform to the party to whom the offer is made. A tender can be made concerning money or specific articles. If the tender is not an offer then it falls in the same category as a  quotation of price.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Vijay Fire Protection Systems vs Vishakhapatnam Port Trust and Anr.

The experienced senior counsel, Sri M. V. Ramana Reddy, arguing on behalf of the petitioner, argued that the respondents’ action in canceling the work order is entirely unlawful, arbitrary, and unjust. The defendants’ behavior in recommending that the petitioner acquire Kirloskar pumps was tainted by malafides.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Case Brief |Santosh Gupta vs. Union of India

The legitimacy of the Centre’s decisions over non-designation of two judges, as well as the revelation of a interaction document between the law minister, the CJ of the High Court of Delhi, and the CJI, were topics of discussion.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Case Brief of Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs. UOI, 1997

The claimant Bandhua Mukti Morcha is a non-governmental organization that aims to protect the public and is involved in welfare works for them. While doing a survey, in Faridabad where the workers were in difficult circumstances, they uncovered some stone quarries.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Minerva Mills vs Union of India, 1980 |Case Brief

Minerva mills is a textile mill located in the vicinity of the city of Bengaluru. In 1970 because of the large decrease in the production of Minerva mills, the central government established a committee in accordance with Section 15 of the Industries Development Act,1951.