CASE NAME Raju Pandurang Mahale v. State of Maharashtra, (2004) 4 SCC 371 CITATION 2004 SCC (Cri) 1259: 2004 […]
CASE NAME Khem Chand v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2008 SCC OnLine Del 1611 CITATION Crl.A. No. 5/2000, Crl.A.
CASE NAME Gurcharan Singh v. State of Haryana, (1972) 2 SCC 749 CITATION 1973 SCR (1) 197, AIR 1972
CASE NAME Deelip Singh v. State of Bihar, (2005) 1 SCC 88 CITATION AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 203, 2004
INTRODUCTION To address non-consensual sex, it is essential to comprehend consent and compulsion because it guarantees that all sexual actions
State of Maharashtra v. Prakash and Anr, AIR 1992 SC 1275 Parties State of Maharashtra, Appellant Prakash, Respondent Facts of
CASE NAME Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2017) 6 SCC 1 CASE NAME (Also known as) NIRBHAYA CASE CITATION
According to the news agency that was trending at the PTI, a divisional court of the Kerala high court did extend the definition of the term rape, saying that any type of non-penetrative sexual act which is between a victim’s thighs that produces a sensation similar to penetration will also be considered rape.
Indian law currently recognises distinct and separate legal identities for husbands and wives, and most of the jurisprudence written in the contemporary age
As per current law, a wife is presumed to deliver perpetual consent to have sex with her husband after entering into marital relations.
Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
