Category: Case Brief

Case Brief, Law Notes

Rajkishore Purohit v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2017)

According to the Court, ‘Common intention’ means ‘state of mind’. It can’t be read objectively. The Supreme Court said that the order of acquittal which was passed by the HC was based on speculation.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Arjun Pawar vs State of Maharashtra |Case Analysis

The assault took place after the election. The hatred would be the only reason for the crime. Though Khandusing won the election he was having anger towards Shriram.

Case Brief, Law Notes

The Ajmal Kasab Case |Case Analysis

The death penalty was given to the appellant Ajmal Kasab by the Trial Court. But Kasab challenged this judgment in the HC. But HC didn’t accept the plea of Kasab and supported the judgment of the Trial Court of the death penalty.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Economic growth vs Environmental Conservation

The issue of economic growth and the environment essentially concerns that the kind of pressure that economic growth has at the national and the international level places on the environment over time.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Sony Pictures Network India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. sportsala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 289/2021 SONY PICTURES NETWORK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .

Case Brief, Law Notes

Surendra Trading Company vs Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills

As we all know IBC is just a 5-time old provision and from time to time colourful emendations and judgment give it a shape. The present judgment bandied is an important judgment as it bandied the pivotal provision of IBC.

Case Brief, Law Notes

The Coca-Cola Company vs Bisleri International Pvt. Ltd.

The plaintiff (Coca Cola Company) purchased and acquired the rights to formulate, intellectual property rights and goodwill attached to the

Case Brief, Law Notes

Canara bank vs Canara sales corporation case |Explained!

After the nationalisation of the said bank, the Canara Bank has been brought on record as the appellant. The suit was instituted for and on behalf of the Canara

Case Brief, Law Notes

The “Bajaj Auto – TVS Motors” patent controversy

A suit was brought up by the Bajaj Auto Limited before the Single bench of Madras High Court regarding infringement of its patent No.195904

Case Brief, Law Notes

Case Brief – R vs. Clarke – Law Notes

R v. Clarke, [1927] 40 CLR 227 Parties: Evan Clarke, Plaintiff The Crown, Defendant Introduction The case deals with the topic, Communication of offer and Acceptance. According to Section 4…

Case Brief, Law Notes

CASE BRIEF – Hart v. O’Connor

Hart v. O’Connor, [1985] AC 1000, 2 ALL ER 880 Parties: Thomas Bruce Hart, Appellant Joseph O’Connor, Respondent Introduction The present case deals with mental incapacity and unconscionability, and whether…

Case Brief, Law Notes

State of Bihar vs Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.

Case Brief State of Bihar v/s Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Citations: AIR 1954 Pat 14 Bench: Das, Ramaswami, Rai Facts For the eight quarters beginning on October 1,…

Case Brief, Law Notes

Case Brief – Rose & Frank Co vs JR Crompton & Bros Ltd

Case Analysis of “Rose & Frank Co v JR Crompton & Bros Ltd”  [1925] AC 445  FACTS OF THE CASE   Rose Frank and Co carry on business in the…

Case Brief, Law Notes

Case Brief – Kedarnath Bhattacharji v. Gorie Mahommed

Kedarnath Bhattacharji v. Gorie Mahommed Citation- (1887) ILR 14 Cal 64  Date of Judgement- 26 November 1886  Bench – W C Petheram, Beverley  FACTS OF THE CASE:  A Town Hall…

Case Brief, Law Notes

Case Brief |Felthouse vs Bindley

n this case, the plaintiff, Paul Felthouse, was a builder living in London. He wished to purchase a horse from his nephew, John Felthouse.

Case Brief, Law Notes

Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala |Explained Case Brief

Kesavananda Bharati vs State Of Kerala(1973) also known as the fundamental right case. it is considered one of the most significant cases in history.