The intention to create a legal obligation is necessary for the existence of a valid contract. Communication of offer and acceptance is absolutely required.
Category: Case Brief
Tinn vs Hoffman |Case analysis
. The intention to create a legal obligation is necessary for the existence of a valid contract. Communication of offer and acceptance is absolutely required.
Perclval Ltd. vs. London County Council Asylums |Explained!
In the present case, the defendants accepted the offer, indicating that an agreement had been made and a contract was formed, hence London County Council Asylums and Mental deficiency Committee had to comply with the instructions given regarding the order that was placed and were liable for not fulfilling the obligations that were upon them.
Hargopal vs People’s Bank of Northern India Ltd |Explained!
The case deals with the acceptance of the subsequent condition. The term “condition” is used broadly in contract law, and it is used commonly associated with “terms,” “condition,” or “clause.”
Case Brief |A. K. Kraipak vs Union Of India |Explained!
The Supreme Court ruled in A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (AIR 1970 SC A) that a person who serves on a committee that selects candidates for a job must not be a candidate for the job himself. The logic is that the judges could be impartial and neutral.
Rajkishore Purohit v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2017)
According to the Court, ‘Common intention’ means ‘state of mind’. It can’t be read objectively. The Supreme Court said that the order of acquittal which was passed by the HC was based on speculation.
Arjun Pawar vs State of Maharashtra |Case Analysis
The assault took place after the election. The hatred would be the only reason for the crime. Though Khandusing won the election he was having anger towards Shriram.
The Ajmal Kasab Case |Case Analysis
The death penalty was given to the appellant Ajmal Kasab by the Trial Court. But Kasab challenged this judgment in the HC. But HC didn’t accept the plea of Kasab and supported the judgment of the Trial Court of the death penalty.
Economic growth vs Environmental Conservation
The issue of economic growth and the environment essentially concerns that the kind of pressure that economic growth has at the national and the international level places on the environment over time.
Sony Pictures Network India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. sportsala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 289/2021 SONY PICTURES NETWORK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .
Surendra Trading Company vs Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills
As we all know IBC is just a 5-time old provision and from time to time colourful emendations and judgment give it a shape. The present judgment bandied is an important judgment as it bandied the pivotal provision of IBC.
Case Brief
The Coca-Cola Company vs Bisleri International Pvt. Ltd.
The plaintiff (Coca Cola Company) purchased and acquired the rights to formulate, intellectual property rights and goodwill attached to the
Case Brief
Canara bank vs Canara sales corporation case |Explained!
After the nationalisation of the said bank, the Canara Bank has been brought on record as the appellant. The suit was instituted for and on behalf of the Canara
The “Bajaj Auto – TVS Motors” patent controversy
A suit was brought up by the Bajaj Auto Limited before the Single bench of Madras High Court regarding infringement of its patent No.195904
Case Brief – R vs. Clarke – Law Notes
R v. Clarke, [1927] 40 CLR 227 Parties: Evan Clarke, Plaintiff The Crown, Defendant Introduction The case deals with the topic, Communication of offer and Acceptance. According to Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, the communication of the offer is complete when it comes to the awareness…
CASE BRIEF – Hart v. O’Connor
Hart v. O’Connor, [1985] AC 1000, 2 ALL ER 880 Parties: Thomas Bruce Hart, Appellant Joseph O’Connor, Respondent Introduction The present case deals with mental incapacity and unconscionability, and whether a contract made with one of the parties being of unsound mind, amounts to a valid contract. Unconscionable contracts are…
