Category: Case Brief
Rajkishore Purohit v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2017)
According to the Court, ‘Common intention’ means ‘state of mind’. It can’t be read objectively. The Supreme Court said that the order of acquittal which was passed by the HC was based on speculation.
Arjun Pawar vs State of Maharashtra |Case Analysis
The assault took place after the election. The hatred would be the only reason for the crime. Though Khandusing won the election he was having anger towards Shriram.
The Ajmal Kasab Case |Case Analysis
The death penalty was given to the appellant Ajmal Kasab by the Trial Court. But Kasab challenged this judgment in the HC. But HC didn’t accept the plea of Kasab and supported the judgment of the Trial Court of the death penalty.
Economic growth vs Environmental Conservation
The issue of economic growth and the environment essentially concerns that the kind of pressure that economic growth has at the national and the international level places on the environment over time.
Sony Pictures Network India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. sportsala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 289/2021 SONY PICTURES NETWORK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .
Surendra Trading Company vs Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills
As we all know IBC is just a 5-time old provision and from time to time colourful emendations and judgment give it a shape. The present judgment bandied is an important judgment as it bandied the pivotal provision of IBC.
The Coca-Cola Company vs Bisleri International Pvt. Ltd.
The plaintiff (Coca Cola Company) purchased and acquired the rights to formulate, intellectual property rights and goodwill attached to the
Canara bank vs Canara sales corporation case |Explained!
After the nationalisation of the said bank, the Canara Bank has been brought on record as the appellant. The suit was instituted for and on behalf of the Canara
The “Bajaj Auto – TVS Motors” patent controversy
A suit was brought up by the Bajaj Auto Limited before the Single bench of Madras High Court regarding infringement of its patent No.195904
Case Brief – R vs. Clarke – Law Notes
R v. Clarke, [1927] 40 CLR 227 Parties: Evan Clarke, Plaintiff The Crown, Defendant Introduction The case deals with the topic, Communication of offer and Acceptance. According to Section 4…
CASE BRIEF – Hart v. O’Connor
Hart v. O’Connor, [1985] AC 1000, 2 ALL ER 880 Parties: Thomas Bruce Hart, Appellant Joseph O’Connor, Respondent Introduction The present case deals with mental incapacity and unconscionability, and whether…
State of Bihar vs Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.
Case Brief State of Bihar v/s Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Citations: AIR 1954 Pat 14 Bench: Das, Ramaswami, Rai Facts For the eight quarters beginning on October 1,…
Case Brief – Rose & Frank Co vs JR Crompton & Bros Ltd
Case Analysis of “Rose & Frank Co v JR Crompton & Bros Ltd” [1925] AC 445 FACTS OF THE CASE Rose Frank and Co carry on business in the…
Case Brief – Kedarnath Bhattacharji v. Gorie Mahommed
Kedarnath Bhattacharji v. Gorie Mahommed Citation- (1887) ILR 14 Cal 64 Date of Judgement- 26 November 1886 Bench – W C Petheram, Beverley FACTS OF THE CASE: A Town Hall…
Case Brief |Felthouse vs Bindley
n this case, the plaintiff, Paul Felthouse, was a builder living in London. He wished to purchase a horse from his nephew, John Felthouse.
Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala |Explained Case Brief
Kesavananda Bharati vs State Of Kerala(1973) also known as the fundamental right case. it is considered one of the most significant cases in history.