A gathering of media organizations occupied with the distributing of papers marked the request for their sake. “They disagreed with the cut-off points on the import of newsprint forced by the Import Control Order 1955, just as the limitations in transit in which newsprint is used by papers forced by the Newsprint Order 1962.
Category: Case Brief
I. R. Coelho vs. State of Tamil Nadu
This decision established a distinction and limited the legislature’s arbitrary activities under the pretence of Article 368. The 9th schedule case is another name for this case. This judgement was given holding the basic structure doctrine propounded in the Kesavananda Bharti case as precedent.
Shatrugan Chauhan and Anr. Vs Union of India
The Governor and the President both dismissed both of these Mercy Petitions. The applicants were not recounted the specialists’ forswearing, and the Mercy Petitions were thought of and chosen following a 12-year stand by.
Independent Thought vs. Union of India and Anr.
In this 2018 landmark case, the Supreme Court’s division bench held that sexual intercourse with a girl under the age of eighteen is rape, regardless of whether she is married or not. Also, Exception 2 of Section-375 under the Indian Penal Code 1860 violates the rights to equality and non-discrimination.
Abhay Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors
The most punctual known use of the Narco-examination strategy in a criminal request happened somewhere in the range of 1903 and 1915, when ‘Sundown Sleep’ was brought into obstetric practice. It has since been used in ‘hypnotherapy’ with war casualties, warriors, and those experiencing extreme pressure, among others. It is a gentle sedative.
Unni Krishnan vs State of Andhra Pradesh
Unni Krishnan’s case was fundamental as far as the Right to Education since it raised the issue of the “Right to life” inside the ambit of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which gives everyone the right to schooling. Financial assets’ inclusion in restricting this right, just as the connection between Fundamental Rights and the Constitution’s Directive Principles.
SR Bommoi vs Union of India: Case Brief
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Background In 1989, when Shri S.R. Bommai was coordinating the Janata Dal organization in Karnataka, various individuals quit the gathering and started an issue blemish on the public authority’s expansive help inside the house. The main priest proposed to the lead representative that a get-together…
Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug v. Union of India
All Indian people have the right to life, according to the country’s constitution. The never-ending controversy over whether this provision can be construed to include the right to die still lingers in the air. On the other hand, with a growing emphasis in the medical industry on patients’ informed consent, the concept of euthanasia has gotten a mixed response in India.
Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. Union of India
The Indian Constitution is a social service document that has an organized and precise expression of economic rights based on directive principles. The parliament’s welfare rules promise to make socioeconomic resources more accessible to the general public and disadvantaged groups.
Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Chander Sen
The late Rangi Lal and his child, Chander Sen, were individuals from a Hindu unified family, as indicated by custom. They claimed some land and worked an organization under the name Khushi Ram Rangi Lal, which they acquired from their dad.
Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India
To address this issue, India’s first Backward Classes Commission, known as the Kalelkar Commission after its chairman, Kaka Kalelkar, was established. The panel was established by Presidential Order under Article 304(2) of the Indian Constitution. On January 29, 1953, the company was founded.
Mrs. Mary Roy vs. the State of Kerala
This case is one of the landmark decisions taken by the Honorable Supreme Court of India. It deals with giving a Christian woman the inheritance law rights of their parents. It was upheld for the first time and overturned by the Travancore Succession Act of 1916, which applied to the Travancore region of Kerala.
K.V. Narayana v. K.V. Ranganathan, AIR 1976
Kota Venkatachala Pathy, the respondents in this, and Kota Narayanan, the litigant thus, were certifiable siblings, being the children of one Kota Rangaswami Chettiar. They made an exchanging family with their cousin Subramanyam Chettiar, the child of Kota Kuppuswami Chettiar and sibling of Kota Rangaswami Chettiar. Subramanyam Chettiar was the family’s chief and karta before 1927.
AP Pollution Control Board vs Prof.MVNayudu (Retd.)
Drinking water is essential for all living creatures. All people, regardless of their stage of development or social and economic level, have the right to the same amount of drinking water and basic requirements, according to a United Nations resolution adopted at the 1977 Water Conference.
Raj Narain Singh v. Chairman Patna Administration committee
An executive authority may make changes to existing or future laws, but not to any essential feature. Because a portion of an Act can be extended, a section or sections can also be selected and applied.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Ankita Sinha
It is, within the end, critical to shop the surroundings from all of the risky pollutants and different factors that have an effect on the united states of America as well.
