State of Maharashtra v. Prakash and Anr, AIR 1992 SC 1275 Parties State of Maharashtra, Appellant Prakash, Respondent Facts of State of Maharashtra vs. Prakash and Anr. Nirmala (PW-1) was born and raised in Pathrot village, where her parents still lived. She was married to PW-2, a villager from Dahegaon….
Category: Case Brief
Republic of Italy vs. Union of India
Republic of Italy v Union of India Citation: (2013) 9 SC 89 Bench: Altamas Kabir CJI, Anil R Dave, Vikramajit Sen JJ FACTS OF THE CASE The incident took place on 15th February 2012, when MV Enrica Lexie, an Italian flagged shipping vessel was on its way to Djibouti. It…
SEBI VS SUBRATA BHATTACHARYA AND ORS
FACTS OF CASE: On 30th September 2009, (a real estate venture of Sahara India) filed a red herring prospectus for was submitted to SEBI for approval for its IPO. At the time of analysis of DRHP of SEBI Sahara Prime City, SEBI noticed unusual fundraising activity in the 2 firms-…
Basanti Bai vs Prafulla Routrai & Ors
Smt. Basanti Bai vs Sri Prafulla Kumar Routrai And Ors By: Viraj Khemani Citations: 101 (2006) CLT 685 Bench: A Parichha FACTS OF BASANTI BAI V. PRAFULLA ROUTRAI & ORS.: The plaintiff desired to purchase a plot from the defendant for constructing a house. But later finding he found that…
TULSIDAS KHANOLKAR Vs. STATE OF GOA
TULSIDAS KHANOLKAR V STATE OF GOA By: Pragya Jain The case is related to a charge on doctor for molesting a female patient on clinic . FACT OF TULSIDAS KHANOLKAR Vs. STATE OF GOA The incident in which allegation occur to a doctor in 2016, which lead to a suspension…
Hardesh Ores Pvt. Ltd vs M/S. Hede And Company
The agreement was to commence on January 01, 1997, but on 12.12.1996 but an order of the Supreme Court dated 12.12.1996 prohibited mining operations in the authorized area, so mining operations could not be commenced.
Bhupinder Singh vs. U.T. of Chandigarh
The post is the case brief of Bhupinder Singh v. U.T. of Chandigarh, as a part of important judgement of section 375 of IPC.
HIND CONSTRUCTION Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
In this case, a contractor takes a contract for making the bank canal near a landi river near Nasik value of Rs. 107000 from the state of Maharashtra
Mukesh & Anr v. State for NCT Of Delhi & Ors. [Nirbhaya case]
CASE NAME Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2017) 6 SCC 1 CASE NAME (Also known as) NIRBHAYA CASE CITATION (2017) 6 Supreme Court Cases 1: (2017) 2 Supreme Court Cases (Cri) 673: 2017 SCC Online SC 533 COURT In the Supreme Court of India BENCH Before Dipak Misra, R….
Deelip Singh v. State of Bihar: Case Analysis
One fine day, the accused forcibly raped her and later consoled her saying that he will marry her. Both of them continued to have sex with each other on several occasions on account of the promise made by the accused to marry her. When she became pregnant, she revealed this to her parents.
Ramji Dayawala & Sons (P) Ltd. v. Invest Import: Case Analysis
Citation: (1981) 1 SCC 80 FACTS The appellant is a private limited company which entered into a sub-contract with the respondent which is a Yugoslavia based company. It had earlier entered into a contract with the State Electricity Board. The contract was for setting up a power station. The appellant…
Somasundaram Pillai vs The Provincial Government Of Madras
Citations: (1947) 1 MLJ 123 Bench: Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J., Lakshmana Rao, J. Facts of the Case The appellant was one of the bidders at a public auction of shops held by the Sub Collector. The conditions of sale were as per the conditions approved by the Board of …
Rupan Bajaj Vs. Kanwar Pal Singh
Citation Rupan Deol Bajaj & Anr v. Kanwar Pal Singh & Anr, 1995 SCC (6) 194 Parties Rupan Deol Bajaj, Petitioner Kanwar Pal Singh, Respondent Facts Mrs. Rupan Deol Bajaj, an Officer of the I.A.S from the Punjab Cadre, working as the Special Secretary, Finance at the time, filed a…
Kailash Prasad vs. State of Bihar
Parties Kailash Prasad and Gatru Mal Kanodia, Appellants State of Bihar, Respondent Citation AIR 1980 SC 106 Facts This is a special leave appeal aimed against the Patna High Court’s verdict. The appellants Kailash Prasad Kanodia and Gatru Mal Kanodia were convicted under Section 302 and Section 326 respectively. Kailash…
M/s. Iffco Tokyo Genral Insurance Ltd. case
Introduction This case analysis has been done on the case of M/s. If Tokyo General Insurance Company Ltd. v. M. Thangeval. This case was presented as an appeal before Madras High Court. It was decided upon by a single judge bench- THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE D.KRISHNA KUMAR. IFFCO-Tokio General Insurance was…
Superintendence Company vs. Krishan Murgai
Parties Superintendence Company of India Ltd, Petitioner Krishan Murgai, Respondent Citation 1980 AIR 1717 Facts The petitioners’ company operated as valuers and surveyors, doing quality inspections, weighing, and a sample of items and commodities. It had established a name and goodwill in its industry by establishing its quality testing and…
