Tinn vs Hoffman |Case analysis
. The intention to create a legal obligation is necessary for the existence of a valid contract. Communication of offer and acceptance is absolutely required.
Explore MoreArchive
Home Category: Case Brief
. The intention to create a legal obligation is necessary for the existence of a valid contract. Communication of offer and acceptance is absolutely required.
Explore MoreIn the present case, the defendants accepted the offer, indicating that an agreement had been made and a contract was formed, hence London County Council Asylums and Mental deficiency Committee had to comply with the instructions given regarding the order that was placed and were liable for not fulfilling the obligations that were upon them.Â
Explore MoreThe case deals with the acceptance of the subsequent condition. The term “condition” is used broadly in contract law, and it is used commonly associated with “terms,” “condition,” or “clause.”
Explore MoreThe Supreme Court ruled in A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (AIR 1970 SC A) that a person who serves on a committee that selects candidates for a job must not be a candidate for the job himself. The logic is that the judges could be impartial and neutral.
Explore MoreAccording to the Court, ‘Common intention’ means ‘state of mind’. It can’t be read objectively. The Supreme Court said that the order of acquittal which was passed by the HC was based on speculation.
Explore MoreThe assault took place after the election. The hatred would be the only reason for the crime. Though Khandusing won the election he was having anger towards Shriram.
Explore MoreThe death penalty was given to the appellant Ajmal Kasab by the Trial Court. But Kasab challenged this judgment in the HC. But HC didn’t accept the plea of Kasab and supported the judgment of the Trial Court of the death penalty.
Explore MoreThe issue of economic growth and the environment essentially concerns that the kind of pressure that economic growth has at the national and the international level places on the environment over time.
Explore MoreIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 289/2021 SONY PICTURES NETWORK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .
Explore MoreAs we all know IBC is just a 5-time old provision and from time to time colourful emendations and judgment give it a shape. The present judgment bandied is an important judgment as it bandied the pivotal provision of IBC.
Explore MoreCopyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
