Sony Pictures Network India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. sportsala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 289/2021 SONY PICTURES NETWORK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 289/2021 SONY PICTURES NETWORK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .
As we all know IBC is just a 5-time old provision and from time to time colourful emendations and judgment give it a shape. The present judgment bandied is an important judgment as it bandied the pivotal provision of IBC.
The plaintiff (Coca Cola Company) purchased and acquired the rights to formulate, intellectual property rights and goodwill attached to the
After the nationalisation of the said bank, the Canara Bank has been brought on record as the appellant. The suit was instituted for and on behalf of the Canara
A suit was brought up by the Bajaj Auto Limited before the Single bench of Madras High Court regarding infringement of its patent No.195904
R v. Clarke, [1927] 40 CLR 227 Parties: Evan Clarke, Plaintiff The Crown, Defendant Introduction The case deals with the
Hart v. O’Connor, [1985] AC 1000, 2 ALL ER 880 Parties: Thomas Bruce Hart, Appellant Joseph O’Connor, Respondent Introduction The
Case Brief State of Bihar v/s Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Citations: AIR 1954 Pat 14 Bench: Das, Ramaswami,
Case Analysis of “Rose & Frank Co v JR Crompton & Bros Ltd” [1925] AC 445 FACTS OF THE CASE
Kedarnath Bhattacharji v. Gorie Mahommed Citation- (1887) ILR 14 Cal 64 Date of Judgement- 26 November 1886 Bench – W