Human Trafficking, Abduction and Kidnapping laws in India | BNS 2023

INTRODUCTION

The offenses of kidnapping, abduction, slavery, and forced labor not only constitute criminal acts but also gravely violate the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of India. These offenses undermine personal liberty, human dignity, and freedom, which are core principles of any democratic society. Kidnapping laws play a crucial role in protecting individuals from such heinous crimes.

Constitutional safeguards, particularly Article 21 and Article 23, provide robust protection against such violations. The Constitution explicitly prohibits trafficking, slavery, and forced labor. It ensures that every individual has the right to live freely and with dignity. Article 24 further strengthens these protections by prohibiting child labor in hazardous environments, addressing the vulnerability of children to exploitation. Kidnapping laws are instrumental in enforcing these rights and ensuring justice.

The legal framework, including the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and labor laws, complements constitutional rights by criminalizing such acts. The judiciary has expanded the interpretation of these rights. It holds that any coercion or exploitation violating freedom and dignity is unconstitutional. These offenses represent severe breaches of fundamental rights. Laws worldwide seek to prevent and punish them to safeguard human freedom and dignity, with kidnapping laws acting as a deterrent against such crimes.

 

Section 137: Kidnapping

The concept of kidnapping in Indian law, as described in Section 137 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, divides kidnapping into two types. Kidnapping laws define strict provisions for addressing these offenses:

1. Kidnapping from India
   • This occurs when a person is conveyed beyond the territorial limits of India without their consent or the consent of someone legally authorized to act on their behalf.
   • Example:

     Taking a person to another country against their will or without their lawful guardian’s consent constitutes kidnapping from India.

Case Law: “Suganthi Suresh Kumar v. Jagdeeshan,” where the Supreme Court emphasized that taking a minor out of the country without parental consent falls under this provision. Kidnapping laws ensure that perpetrators of such crimes are brought to justice.

1. Kidnapping from Lawful Guardianship
   • This takes place when a child (below 16 years for males and below 18 years for females) or a person of unsound mind is taken or enticed out of the lawful custody of their guardian without consent.
   • Example: If a person persuades a minor girl to leave her home without her parents’ consent, it is kidnapping from lawful guardianship, even if the girl voluntarily agrees to go.

Case Law: “Vishwanath v. State of” UP”—The accused enticed a minor girl away from her lawful guardian without consent. The court held it to be kidnapping, even though the girl willingly left with him, as her consent was legally irrelevant.  This case highlights the importance of kidnapping laws in protecting minors.

Explanation of Terms:

• Lawful Guardian: Includes any person who is legally entrusted with the care of the child or person of unsound mind, such as parents or legal custodians.

Exception:

• If a person, in good faith, believes themselves to be the father of an illegitimate child or entitled to lawful custody, they are exempt from this provision, unless their action is for an immoral or unlawful purpose.

Example: If a biological father takes his illegitimate child from the guardian, thinking he has a right, and does so without any unlawful intent, he may fall under this exception.

Punishment:

Whoever commits kidnapping from India or from lawful guardianship is punishable with imprisonment of up to seven years and a fine.

Case Law: “R. Shyam Babu v. State of” MP”—The court ruled that kidnapping is a serious offense, and the accused were sentenced to imprisonment for unlawfully taking a minor from her guardianship without consent. Kidnapping laws impose stringent penalties for such crimes.

In essence, kidnapping involves taking or enticing a person out of their legal boundaries or guardianship without proper consent, with strict penalties for such actions under the IPC.

Section 138 : Abduction

This section defines abduction as using force or deceit to make someone move against their will. Physical force or trickery both qualify as abduction.The act involves making a person leave their current location unwillingly. The law considers it a criminal offense under this provision.

Kidnapping laws provide a legal basis for prosecuting such offenses.

Illustration:

Abduction by force occurs when a perpetrator compels someone to move under threat, such as forcing them into a car at gunpoint. Abduction by deceit involves trickery, such as luring someone with a false promise of a job interview. Both scenarios qualify as abduction under the law.

 

Section 130 : Kidnapping or maiming a child for purposes of begging

Section 139 deals with the serious offense of exploiting children for begging. It defines the punishments for individuals who either kidnap children or unlawfully take custody of them, intending to use them for begging. Begging, in this context, refers to the act of seeking money or food by soliciting alms in public places, often through a display of poverty or helplessness. Kidnapping laws ensure that such exploitation is met with severe consequences.

1. Subsection (1):
   

   This addresses situations where someone kidnaps or takes control of a child, knowing that they are not the lawful guardian, with the intent of using that child for begging. The law imposes a minimum punishment of ten years of rigorous imprisonment, which may extend to life imprisonment. Additionally, the guilty party is also liable to pay a fine. This subsection aims to deter those who exploit vulnerable children by making them beg in the streets or public places.

2. Subsection (2):

   This covers more extreme cases where a person deliberately maims or disfigures a child, making the child appear more pitiful to increase the amount of money received through begging. Such an act is considered even more heinous, punishable by at least twenty years of imprisonment, which may extend to life imprisonment for the remainder of the offender’s natural life, along with a fine. This highlights the offense’s severity when a child suffers physical harm for personal gain.

3. Subsection (3):

   The law presumes that anyone who is not the lawful guardian and employs or uses a child for begging has kidnapped or unlawfully taken custody of the child for this purpose. It shifts the burden of proof to the accused, meaning they must prove that they did not obtain the child unlawfully or with the intent to exploit them for begging.

In essence, this section criminalizes not only the act of kidnapping children for begging but also any form of physical harm done to children with the intent of making them beg. It also places a heavy presumption of guilt on those found using children for begging, making it easier for the law to prosecute such cases.

ILLUSTRATION

A woman named Kavita, who runs a begging racket, kidnaps a 9-year-old girl named Meera. To ensure Meera evokes more pity from the public and collects more money, Kavita intentionally maims Meera by breaking her leg. With the visible injury, Meera is forced to sit in front of a temple and beg every day.

An NGO, upon discovering the situation, rescues Meera and reports Kavita to the authorities. The court finds that Kavita deliberately harmed the child to increase her earnings from begging. Kavita is charged under Section 139(2) for maiming a child to employ her for begging.

Section 140 : Kidnapping or abducting in order to murder or for ransom, etc.

This provision outlines the punishments for various forms of kidnapping or abduction based on the offender’s intent and the harm caused. Kidnapping laws mandate life imprisonment or even the death penalty for those who commit such grave offenses.

Kidnapping laws serve as an essential legal framework to protect individuals from abduction and forced confinement.

Subsection (1):

This deals with cases where a person kidnaps or abducts another with the intent of having them murdered or placing them in a situation where they may be in danger of being murdered. The law punishes such acts with either life imprisonment or rigorous imprisonment for up to 10 years, along with a fine. This recognizes the seriousness of putting someone’s life in danger, even if murder does not actually occur.

Subsection (2):

This addresses situations where a person kidnaps or abducts another, detains them, and either threatens or causes harm or death to the victim. The offender compels a government, foreign state, organization, or person to act or refrain or demands ransom. The law punishes this crime with death or life imprisonment, emphasizing its severity, especially when threats or harm are used to coerce. Kidnapping laws impose strict penalties to deter such grave offenses.

Subsection (3):

This covers cases where a person kidnaps or abducts another with the intent to secretly and wrongfully confine them. In these situations, the offender can be punished with imprisonment for up to 7 years and fined. This subsection emphasizes the wrongful deprivation of someone’s freedom without lawful cause.

Subsection (4):

This applies to kidnapping or abduction intended to cause grievous hurt, slavery, or unnatural lust, or to endanger the victim. The offender may face up to 10 years of imprisonment and a fine. This recognizes the seriousness of crimes where the victim is at risk of severe physical harm or exploitation

ILLUSTRATION

X kidnaps Y and takes Y to a remote location where X plans to kill Y or leave Y in a dangerous situation that may result in Y’s murder.

If caught, X could face life imprisonment or a maximum of 10 years under this provision.

X kidnaps Y and demands ransom from Y’s family, threatening to kill Y if unpaid. X may face death or life imprisonment.

X kidnaps Y with the intention of selling Y into slavery or forcing Y into an exploitative situation where grievous hurt may occur. X can be sentenced to up to 10 years of imprisonment.

Section 141 : Importation of girl or boy from foreign country

This provision addresses the offense of importing minors into India with the intent or knowledge that they may be forced or seduced into illicit intercourse. Here’s a breakdown of the provision:

• The act of bringing a girl under the age of 21 or a boy under the age of 18 into India from another country with either:

• • Intent: The purpose of forcing or seducing them into illicit intercourse with another person.
  • Knowledge: The awareness that it is likely that they will be forced or seduced into such illicit intercourse.

• Punishment:

• • Imprisonment: The offender can be imprisoned for a period of up to 10 years.
  • Fine: In addition to imprisonment, the offender is also liable to pay a fine.

Illustration:

• X arranges for Y, a girl under the age of 21, to be brought into India from a neighboring country. X intends to force Y into prostitution, or X knows it is likely that someone will make Y engage in such illicit intercourse.

Section 143 : Trafficking of person

This provision defines trafficking and outlines its offense. It specifies punishments based on the circumstances of the crime. The law addresses various forms of trafficking and their severity. The law tailors punishments to deter such offenses effectively. It focuses on the recruitment, transportation, and exploitation of individuals through coercive means for illegal purposes.

Trafficking Defined:

1. • Offense: Trafficking occurs when someone, for the purpose of exploitation, engages in
     • Recruiting,
     • Transporting,
     • Harboring,
     • Transferring, or
     • Receiving a person or persons.
   • Means of Trafficking: Trafficking can occur through:
     • (a) Threats,
     • (b) Force or coercion,
     • (c) Abduction,
     • (d) Fraud or deception,
     • Taking advantage of a person in control of the victim (such as a parent or guardian).

Punishments:

2. General Punishment for Trafficking:

1. • Imprisonment: A minimum of 7 years, up to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment.
   • Fine: The offender is also liable to pay a fine.

3. Trafficking of More Than One Person:

1. • Imprisonment: A minimum of 10 years, which may extend to life imprisonment.
   • Fine: The offender is also liable to pay a fine.

4. Trafficking of a Child (anyone under 18 years of age):

1. • Imprisonment: A minimum of 10 years, which may extend to life imprisonment.
   • Fine: The offender is also liable to pay a fine.

5. Trafficking of More Than One Child:

1. • Imprisonment: A minimum of 14 years, which may extend to life imprisonment.
   • Fine: The offender is also liable to pay a fine.

6. Repeat Offender for Child Trafficking:

1. • If a person is convicted of child trafficking more than once, they will face life imprisonment for their natural life and a fine.

7. Public servants or police involvement:

1. • If a public servant or police officer engages in trafficking, they will face life imprisonment for their natural life and a fine.

Illustrations:

Example: X recruits Y under false pretenses and transports Y to another city to force Y into forced labor in a factory. X is guilty of trafficking and can face 7 to 10 years of imprisonment.

Section 144: :Exploitation of a trafficked person

This provision targets individuals who engage in the sexual exploitation of trafficked persons or children, even if they did not personally commit the trafficking but were aware or had reason to believe that the person was trafficked. Let’s break it down:

1. Engagement in Sexual Exploitation of a Trafficked Child:
   • Offense: If someone knowingly, or with reason to believe, that a child has been trafficked engages the child for sexual exploitation in any way, they are guilty under this section.
   • Punishment:

1. • • Imprisonment: Rigorous imprisonment for a minimum of 5 years, which may extend up to 10 years.
     • Fine: The offender is also liable to pay a fine.

• Illustration: X runs a business that provides trafficked children for sexual exploitation. Even if X did not directly traffic the child but knew or had reason to believe the child was trafficked, the court can punish X with at least 5 to 10 years of imprisonment.

2. Engagement in Sexual Exploitation of a Trafficked Person (Adult):
   • Offense: If someone knowingly, or with reason to believe, that an adult has been trafficked engages the trafficked person for sexual exploitation in any way, they are guilty under this section.
   • Punishment:

1. • • Imprisonment: Rigorous imprisonment for a minimum of 3 years, which may extend up to 7 years.
     • Fine: The offender is also liable to pay a fine.

• Illustration: X hires trafficked adults for sexual exploitation, knowing or having reason to believe they were trafficked. The court can sentence X to 3 to 7 years in prison for this offense.

Conclusion

Kidnapping, abduction, slavery, forced labor, and human trafficking are criminal acts and severe human rights violations. They infringe on personal liberty, dignity, and freedom, core principles of democratic societies. The Indian Constitution, through Articles 21, 23, and 24, safeguards against such violations. It ensures the right to live free from coercion and exploitation.

Legal provisions, including those in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, criminalize and penalize these acts. Kidnapping laws deter offenders and uphold justice. Severe penalties address kidnapping, abduction, trafficking, and exploitation, especially of vulnerable groups like children. They aim to deter offenders and uphold justice. Severe penalties address kidnapping, abduction, trafficking, and exploitation, especially of vulnerable groups like children. These reflect the legal system’s commitment to protecting individual rights.

Strict punishments and legal presumptions deter such offenses. They preserve human dignity and liberty. The judiciary plays a key role in interpreting and applying these laws. It addresses modern challenges like trafficking and forced labor effectively. Together, constitutional protections and legal frameworks safeguard fundamental human rights and individual dignity.