Case Brief: Ajit Singh v. State of Punjab
CASE NAME Ajit Singh vs State of Punjab & Anr CITATION 1967 AIR 856, 1967 SCR (2) 143 COURT Supreme […]
CASE NAME Ajit Singh vs State of Punjab & Anr CITATION 1967 AIR 856, 1967 SCR (2) 143 COURT Supreme […]
The skin-to-skin controversy has caused a lot of discussions about how India’s child protection laws are understood and used. The POCSO Act was created to be a complete law protecting all children under 18 from various sexual crimes, both those involving penetration and those that don’t.
The provision of section 482 of Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 regulates the law of anticipatory bail in India, superseding the previous Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
INTRODUCTION ARTICLE 20: PROTECTION IN RESPECT OF CONVICTION FOR OFFENCES: Article 20(1): No person shall be convicted of any offence
CASE NAME Baban Singh And Anr. v. Jagdish Singh & Ors., (1966) 3 SCR 552 CITATION 1967 AIR 68, (1967)
CASE NAME Arjunsingh vs The State on 15 November, 1957 CITATION AIR1958RAJ347 COURT Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur BENCH
CASE NAME A. Devendran v. State of T.N., (1997) 11 SCC 720 CITATION 1998 SCC (Cri) 220 COURT Supreme
CASE NAME Latesh v. State of Maharashtra CITATION (2018) 3 SCC 66 COURT Supreme Court of India BENCH Justice N.V.
CASE NAME Vinod Chaturvedi v. State of M.P., (1984) 2 SCC 350 CITATION 1984 SCR (3) 93, AIR 1984
CASE NAME V. Rajaram v. State, (2020) 3 SCC 200 CITATION (2020) 2 SCC (Cri) 20, 2019 SCC OnLine