The Indian Constitution is an ocean of democratic principles that artfully balances the fundamental rights of its citizens, intending to achieve a stable and orderly society.
In a landmark decision that brings constitutional principles into step with the realities of digital age, the Supreme Court of India in the cases of Pragya Prasun v. Union of India and Amar Jain v. Union of India and ors held that the right to access digital services are a fundamental aspect of right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21.
Indian judiciary holds a pivotal function in moulding the constitutional and legal landscape of the country. It performs the function of custodian of the Constitution, which means it assures that the actions of the legislature and the executive are in tune with the principles laid down by the Constitution itself
INTRODUCTION ARTICLE 20: PROTECTION IN RESPECT OF CONVICTION FOR OFFENCES: Article 20(1): No person shall be convicted of any offence
We have attempted to comprehend not only who the government regards as a minority through this essay, but also the reasoning behind the government’s recent revisions to the reservation regulations for minority universities. Important concerns like “who can be considered a minority” and “whether affiliation is a Fundamental Right” have been subjected to a laborious process that we have witnessed.
Article 368 of the Constitution of India defines the procedure for its amendment through which parliament accordingly makes alterations to preserve the essence of constitutionalism.
The relationship between Fundamental Rights (FRS) and State Policy Directive Principles (DPSPs) is rooted in the historical developments and philosophical ideals that shaped the Indian Constitution.
The judiciary is one of the most pivotal institutions of democracy in India. It checks whether the government works according to the constitution and sees that the rights of the individuals are protected.
The idea of constitutional morality expresses some keys to keeping a nation in line with the concepts of the Constitution rather than with social, religious, or traditional norms.
The term habeas corpus is a Latin term which translates into the term “you must have the body”. However, recent developments of law suggest that the writ of habeas corpus includes the production of the body of the person alleged to be unlawfully detained is not essential.
Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
