CASE NAME Jarnail Singh vs Lachhmi Narain Gupta. CITATION Civil Appeal No. 629 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) […]
Case Name Balaji Raghavan v. Union of India Citation (1996) 1 SCC 361 Court The Supreme Court of India Bench
Introduction A landmark ruling in Indian constitutional law that addresses the issue of the national anthem’s forced singing in schools
The case of Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & Ors. (1981) 1 SCC 722 is an important case in Indian Constitutional Law that deals specifically with the interpretation of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. In this case, the Supreme Court of India established a ‘six-factor test’ for determining if an entity can be deemed as an agency of the State.
The Indian Constitution is an ocean of democratic principles that artfully balances the fundamental rights of its citizens, intending to achieve a stable and orderly society.
In a landmark decision that brings constitutional principles into step with the realities of digital age, the Supreme Court of India in the cases of Pragya Prasun v. Union of India and Amar Jain v. Union of India and ors held that the right to access digital services are a fundamental aspect of right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21.
 Indian judiciary holds a pivotal function in moulding the constitutional and legal landscape of the country. It performs the function of custodian of the Constitution, which means it assures that the actions of the legislature and the executive are in tune with the principles laid down by the Constitution itself
INTRODUCTION ARTICLE 20: PROTECTION IN RESPECT OF CONVICTION FOR OFFENCES: Article 20(1): No person shall be convicted of any offence
We have attempted to comprehend not only who the government regards as a minority through this essay, but also the reasoning behind the government’s recent revisions to the reservation regulations for minority universities. Important concerns like “who can be considered a minority” and “whether affiliation is a Fundamental Right” have been subjected to a laborious process that we have witnessed.
Article 368 of the Constitution of India defines the procedure for its amendment through which parliament accordingly makes alterations to preserve the essence of constitutionalism.
Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
