Case Brief: Minerva Mills v. Union of India
CASE NAME Minerva Mills v UOI CASE NAME (also known as) The fundamental rights case CITATION 1980 AIR 1789, 1981 […]
CASE NAME Minerva Mills v UOI CASE NAME (also known as) The fundamental rights case CITATION 1980 AIR 1789, 1981 […]
CASE NAME Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248 CASE NAME (Also known as) Personal liberty case.
CASE NAME Kesavananda Bharti v State of Kerala CASE NAME (also known as) The fundamental rights case CITATION 1973 4
CASE NAME K.S. Puttaswamy (Privacy-5J.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 641 CASE NAME (Also known as) The Right
                                          CASE NAME Jarnail Singh vs Lachhmi Narain Gupta. CITATION Civil Appeal No. 629 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C)
Case Name Balaji Raghavan v. Union of India Citation (1996) 1 SCC 361 Court The Supreme Court of India Bench
Introduction A landmark ruling in Indian constitutional law that addresses the issue of the national anthem’s forced singing in schools
The case of Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & Ors. (1981) 1 SCC 722 is an important case in Indian Constitutional Law that deals specifically with the interpretation of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. In this case, the Supreme Court of India established a ‘six-factor test’ for determining if an entity can be deemed as an agency of the State.
The Indian Constitution is an ocean of democratic principles that artfully balances the fundamental rights of its citizens, intending to achieve a stable and orderly society.
In a landmark decision that brings constitutional principles into step with the realities of digital age, the Supreme Court of India in the cases of Pragya Prasun v. Union of India and Amar Jain v. Union of India and ors held that the right to access digital services are a fundamental aspect of right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21.