Disputes over the termination of employment are a constant element of labour and industrial law, usually involving questions about employers’ compliance with procedures and workers’ rights. It is often necessary to turn to the courts in these instances so as to determine whether the termination was valid and what remedy should be granted.
The case of Poona Labour Union vs. State of Maharashtra (1969) addresses a labor dispute where the Poona Labour Union petitioned for a writ of mandamus to compel the State to refer their industrial dispute to a tribunal.
The issue started when G. Claridge & Co., Ltd., a business established under the Indian Companies Act of 1918, filed a petition contesting the decisions rendered by the Industrial Tribunal, which was established by the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947.
Citation (2016(67)PTC509(Bom).) Court High Court of judicature at Bombay Decided on 1 March 2017 Judges Honorable Justices A.S. Oka,
Judge S.J. Vazifdar Court Bombay High court Date 12.2.2008 Appellant Ravi Kumar Bali Respondent Kala tech Introduction The Ravi
Citation Bayer Corporation vs Union of India (2014) Bombay HC Writ Petition No.1323 OF 2013 Court Bombay High Court
CASE NAME Ajay Pandit v. State of Maharashtra, (2012) 8 SCC 43 CITATION 2012 AIR SCW 4062, 2012 (8)
CASE NAME Whirlpool of India Ltd. Vs. Videocon Industries Ltd. CITATION MANU/MH/0639/2014 COURT In The High Court Of Bombay
CASE NAME Narendra Hirawat and Co. v. Aftab Music Industries & Anr. CITATION INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 20559 OF
CASE NAME Syed Shafiq Ahmed v. State Of Maharashtra And Ors., 2002 CRILJ 1403 CITATION 2002 CRILJ 1403 COURT
Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
