Offences by Public Servants under BNS 2023 | A Legal Framework

INTRODUCTION

Public servants, also known as government officials or employees, are entrusted with various duties and responsibilities to serve the public interest and uphold the integrity of governmental institutions. Given the critical nature of their roles, it is paramount that their conduct remains beyond reproach. To ensure this, legal frameworks worldwide have established specific offences by public servants that they can be charged with if they engage in misconduct or abuse their positions.

Key Concepts

1. Public Servant Definition:

   • A public servant is typically defined as an individual employed by the government, whether at the federal, state, or local level, who is responsible for performing duties that benefit the public. This can include elected officials, bureaucrats, law enforcement officers, and other government employees.

2. Importance of Integrity:

   • The integrity of public servants is crucial for maintaining public trust in government institutions. Any form of corruption, abuse of power, or dereliction of duty can severely undermine public confidence and the effective functioning of the state.

Common Offences by Public Servants

1. Corruption:

   • Corruption involves the abuse of public office for private gain. This can include accepting bribes, embezzling public funds, or engaging in favoritism or nepotism. Anti-corruption laws and bodies are often established to investigate and prosecute such offences.

2. Bribery:

   • Bribery is the act of offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting something of value to influence the actions of a public servant. Both the giver and receiver of bribes can be prosecuted under bribery laws.

3. Abuse of Power:

   • Abuse of power occurs when a public servant uses their position to exert undue influence or authority for personal or political gain. This can include wrongful imprisonment, unlawful retaliation, or misuse of confidential information.

4. Misconduct in Public Office:

   • Misconduct refers to improper or unlawful behavior by a public servant while in office. This can range from minor breaches of protocol to serious offences like fraud or theft.

5. Negligence:

   • Negligence involves the failure to perform duties with the expected level of care and competence. Public servants can be held liable if their negligence results in harm to individuals or the public.

Legal Provisions Addressing Offences by Public Servants

Section 198:Public servant disobeying law, with intent to cause injury to any person

This provision deals with public servants who deliberately disobey legal rules governing their conduct. Here’s a simplified explanation:

Explanation:

1. Who is Involved:

   • The law applies to a public servant (someone who works for the government or in a public role).

2. Disobeying the Law:

   • If a public servant knowingly disobeys any law or rule that applies to how they should perform their duties, they are committing an offense.

3. Intent or Knowledge:

   • The public servant must either:
     • Intend to cause harm to someone by their disobedience, or
     • Know that their disobedience is likely to cause harm or injury to a person.

4. Punishment:

   • If found guilty, the public servant can be punished with simple imprisonment for up to one year, a fine, or both.

Purpose:

This provision ensures that public servants follow the laws and rules related to their duties. It is meant to prevent public officials from misusing their position in a way that causes harm to others. By holding them accountable for deliberate disobedience, the law seeks to promote responsible and lawful behavior among public servants.

ILLUSTRATION :

If a police officer knowingly ignores a legal procedure while arresting someone, and as a result, the person suffers harm, the officer can be punished under this law because they disobeyed the legal rules meant to protect people’s rights.

In short, this law punishes public servants who break the rules on purpose and cause harm to someone in the process.

Section 201: Public servant framing an incorrect document with intent to cause injury

This provision addresses the offense committed by a public servant who is responsible for preparing or translating official documents or electronic records and intentionally does so in an incorrect manner, knowing it could cause harm to others. Here’s a simplified explanation:

Explanation:

1. Who is Involved:

   • The law applies to a public servant whose duty involves the preparation or translation of documents or electronic records.

2. Incorrect Document or Translation:

   • If the public servant knowingly or believes the document or translation they prepare is incorrect, they commit an offense.

3. Intent or Knowledge:

   • The public servant must either:
     • Intend to cause harm to someone by preparing the incorrect document, or
     • Know that their actions are likely to cause harm to someone by doing so.

4. Punishment:

   • If found guilty, the public servant can be punished with imprisonment for up to three years, a fine, or both.

Purpose:

This provision ensures that public servants who are responsible for important documents or records perform their duties honestly and accurately. It aims to prevent harm that could result from false or incorrect documentation, ensuring accountability in government or official processes.

Illustration:

A government official is responsible for preparing land ownership records. Knowing that it is incorrect, the official alters the document to show that a piece of land belongs to someone else, intending to cause harm to the rightful owner. The official can be punished for knowingly preparing a false document to cause injury.

A public servant tasked with translating an important legal document deliberately mistranslates key parts, knowing it will result in financial loss or legal trouble for a party involved. By doing this knowingly, the public servant can be held accountable under this law.

Section 202: Public servant unlawfully engaging in trade

This law addresses the situation where a public servant engages in trade, even though they are legally prohibited from doing so. Here’s a simplified explanation:

• If a public servant (such as a government employee) is legally bound by their job rules not to engage in any trade (business or commercial activity), but they still do so, they are committing an offense.
• The punishment for this offense can be:
  1. Up to one year of simple imprisonment (a type of imprisonment without hard labor), or
  2. A fine, or
  3. Both imprisonment and a fine, or
  4. Community service as an alternative punishment.

ILLUSTRATION:

A government official, who by law cannot run a private business while holding their position, starts a side business selling goods. If discovered, this official can be punished by serving time in prison for up to one year, paying a fine, or performing community service, or a combination of these penalties.

This law ensures that public servants focus on their duties and avoid conflicts of interest that could arise from engaging in trade or business activities.

Section 203: Public servant unlawfully buying or bidding for property

This legal provision is concerned with misconduct by a public servant with respect to prohibited purchases or bids on certain properties. It outlines the offense, punishment, and the consequences regarding the property involved. Here’s a breakdown:

Key Elements:

1. Public Servant:

   • The person involved must be a public servant, i.e., someone employed by the government or its agencies.

2. Legally Bound Not to Purchase or Bid:

   • The public servant is under a legal obligation (by law or regulation) not to purchase or bid for a specific property. This legal binding could stem from the individual’s official position, preventing conflict of interest or abuse of power.

3. Act of Purchasing or Bidding:

   • Despite this restriction, if the public servant either:
     • Purchases the property,
     • Bids for the property,
     • Does this in their own name, someone else’s name, or in conjunction with others (jointly or in shares),

it constitutes an offense.

Punishment:

• The penalty for this misconduct includes:
  • Simple imprisonment for up to two years,
  • A fine,
  • Or both (imprisonment and fine together).

Confiscation of Property:

• If the public servant successfully purchases the property in violation of the law, the property will be confiscated by the state.

Purpose of the Law:

This provision is intended to prevent corruption and ensure that public servants do not exploit their position for personal gain. By restricting public servants from purchasing or bidding on certain properties, it minimizes conflicts of interest and safeguards public trust in the governance system.

It emphasizes accountability and transparency in the conduct of public officials, especially in dealings involving state or public property.

 

Section 205 : Wearing garb or carrying token used by public servant with fraudulent intent

This provision deals with impersonation or misrepresentation involving public servants.

Key Elements:

1. Not Belonging to a Certain Class of Public Servants:

   • The person involved is not actually a member of a specific class or category of public servants.

2. Wearing Garb or Carrying Tokens:

   • The person wears clothing or carries symbols (tokens) that resemble those used by the particular class of public servants.

3. Intent or Knowledge:

   • The person either:
     • Intends for others to believe they belong to that class of public servants,
     • Knows that it is likely others will believe they belong to that class.

Punishment:

• The penalty for such impersonation includes:
  • Imprisonment of up to three months (either simple or rigorous),
  • A fine up to five thousand rupees,
  • Or both imprisonment and fine.

This provision is designed to:

• Prevent Fraud: Stop individuals from deceiving others into believing they have official authority or power that they do not possess.
• Protect Public Trust: Ensure that the public can trust that individuals wearing official uniforms or carrying official symbols are genuinely authorized.
• Maintain Order: Avoid confusion and potential misuse of public symbols that could undermine the integrity of public services.

By criminalizing the act of impersonating public servants, the law aims to safeguard the legitimacy and effectiveness of public administration and prevent misuse of official symbols.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, offences by public servants represent a significant challenge to the integrity and efficacy of public administration.  These offences, which may include bribery, corruption, abuse of power, and negligence, undermine public trust and hinder the delivery of essential services. It is crucial for governments and institutions to implement stringent measures to prevent such misconduct. This includes robust legal frameworks, transparent processes, regular audits, and stringent enforcement of anti-corruption laws. Additionally, fostering a culture of accountability and ethical behavior among public servants is essential. By addressing these issues comprehensively, we can enhance the integrity of public service, ensure the effective use of public resources, and maintain the public’s trust in government institutions.