Menu Close

Harshad Mehta Scam: Case Analysis

By: Somey Saini

INTRODUCTION 

The trick was the greatest currency market trick at any point submitted in India, adding up to roughly Rs. 5000 crore. The principal culprit of the trick was stock and currency market dealer  Harshad Mehta. It was a methodical stock misrepresentation utilizing bank receipts and stamp paper that made the Indian financial exchange crash.  

The trick uncovered the inborn provisos of the Indian monetary frameworks and brought about a  totally transformed arrangement of stock exchanges, including a presentation of online security systems. 

Security cheats allude to the possibility of redirection of assets from the financial framework to different investors or brokers. 

The 1992 trick was orderly extortion submitted by Mehta in the Indian financial exchange which prompted the total breakdown of safety frameworks. He submitted extortion of more than 1 billion from the financial framework to purchase stocks on the Bombay Stock Exchange. 

This affected the whole trade framework as the security framework fell and financial backers lost a huge number of rupees in the trade framework. The extent of the trick was entirely huge, to the point that the net worth of the stocks was higher than the consolidated wellbeing and training financial plan of India.

The trick was coordinated so that Mehta got protections from the  State Bank of India against fashioned checks endorsed by degenerate authorities and neglected to convey the protections. Mehta made the costs of the stocks take off high through imaginary practices and sold the stocks that he claimed in these companies. 

The effect of the trick had numerous results, which incorporated the misfortunes brought about by lakhs of families and the prompt accident of the securities exchange. The file tumbled from  4500 to 2500 addressing a deficiency of Rs.1000 billion in market capitalisation. 

ISSUES

The 1992 trick brought up many issues including  

  • ➢ Bank authorities are answerable for being in a plot with Mehta. 
  • ➢ A meeting with Montek Singh Ahluwalia (Secretary, financial undertakings at the  Ministry of Finance) uncovered that many top bank authorities were involved. 
See also  Novation and its conditions

JUDGEMENT

An uncommon court here has indicted and granted fluctuating prison terms to five people,  including senior bank authorities, in the 1992 protections trick.  

Equity Shalini Phansalkar Joshi, who managed a lot of cases identified with the 1992 trick,  indicted R Lakshminarayanan and S Srinivasan of Financial Fairgrowth Services Limited  (FFSL), and Tharian Chacko, Y Sundara Babu and R Kalyana Raman of Andhra Bank Financial  Services Ltd (ABFSL), an auxiliary of Andhra Bank. 

While the court condemned Lakshminarayanan and Srinivasan, chief and senior VP individually of FFSL around then, to detainment as long as three years, the authorities of ABFSL were condemned to four years.

As per the judgment passed on Thursday, those sentenced “purposely managed deceitful exchanges among FFSL and ABFSL between July 1991 and May 1992”.  

According to the arraignment’s case, FFSL, a private firm, was confronting an intense money crunch and was frantically needing extra assets.  

It, hence, started to acquire vigorously from ABFSL and different banks and monetary firms. Those sentenced worked with such borrowings without guaranteeing that the exchanges were made against stocks. 

Phansalkarb Joshi added that regardless of whether the court was to acknowledge the conflict that the convicts didn’t make any close to home additions, it should recall the view taken by the zenith court in past decisions that monetary tricks influence the economy of the country.  

“Such tricks bring about the deficiency of hard-brought in cash for some guiltless individuals from the general population. A few casualties even lose their lives,” she said while granting the sentence.  

The court, be that as it may, suspended the sentence of all. 

INTERPRETATION:-

  • ➢ Harshad Mehta, an enlisted and notable intermediary, controlled the Bombay Stock  Exchange (BSE) alongside his accomplices by exploiting escape clauses in the financial  framework.terpretation 
  • ➢ Mehta supposedly intrigued with bank representatives to get phony bank receipts (BRs)  gave. He utilized these BRs to get different banks to loan him cash under the feeling  that they were loaning against government protections (G-Secs). 
  • ➢ This sum was then placed into the financial exchange to juice up share costs by up to a  stunning 4,400 percent. Mehta then, at that point, sold these offers at a huge benefit  and the chief sum was gotten back to the banks. 
  • ➢ Altogether, Mehta duped the banks of almost Rs 4,000 crore. Afterwards, when his method of activity in the financial exchange was found and uncovered, banks understood that they were in control of phoney BRs holding no worth. 
  • ➢ There was a radical fall in share costs and market record, causing a breakdown of the protections control framework activity with the business banks and the RBI. ➢ Around 35 billion from the 2,500 billion markets was removed, causing the offer market breakdown. The Bombay Stock offers turned to records altering in the exchanging system. 
  • ➢ It caused alarm with people in general and banks were seriously affected. Banks like  Standard Chartered and ANZ Grindlays were involved in the trick for bank receipt imitation and move of cash into Mehta’s own record. The public authority understood that the basic issue with the monetary construction of the financial exchanges was the absence of modernized frameworks which affected the entire stock market. 
  • ➢ Different bank officials were researched and involved in false charges. The five fundamental charged authorities were identified with the Financial Fairgrowth Services  Limited (FFSL) and Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd (ABFSL). 
  • ➢ The executive of Vijaya Bank ended it all after the report about the bank receipt trick.  The trick prompted the abdication of P. Chidambaram who was blamed for claiming shell organizations associated with Mehta. Mehta was sentenced by the Bombay High  Court and the Supreme Court of India as far as it matters for him in the monetary outrage esteemed at 49.99 billion (USD $740 million). Different bank authorities were captured, prompting a total breakdown of banking frameworks. 
See also  LEGALITY OF CRYPTOCURRENCY IN INDIA

CONCLUSION:- 

It, hence, started to acquire vigorously from ABFSL and different banks and monetary firms.  Those sentenced worked with such borrowings without guaranteeing that the exchanges were made against stocks. 

Phansalkarb Joshi added that regardless of whether the court was to acknowledge the conflict that the convicts didn’t make any close to home additions, it should recall the view taken by the zenith court in past decisions that monetary tricks influence the economy of the country. 

“Such tricks bring about the deficiency of hard-brought in cash for some guiltless individuals from the general population. A few casualties even lose their lives,” she said while granting the sentence.  

REFERENCES:- 

Author/Editor

Leave a Reply

Volume 1 Issue 4

Holler Box

Join the fastest-growing community!

It's not been a year yet, but we are glad that the students have accepted us and supported us!

More than 2000 students have already been a part of the Legal Lock community!

What are you looking for?

Click here to join now!

  
Holler Box