Novartis AG vs Union Of India & Ors
The case of Novartis AG v. Union of India, decided by a two-judge panel of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, is one of India’s landmark decisions.
Explore MoreThe case of Novartis AG v. Union of India, decided by a two-judge panel of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, is one of India’s landmark decisions.
Explore MoreSmt. Sushmita Ghosh, the wife of Shri G.C. Ghosh (Mohd. Karim Ghazi), filed a Writ Petition in this Court, claiming that she married Shri G.C. Ghosh in accordance with Hindu rituals on May 10, 1984, and that they have been living peacefully in Delhi since then.
Explore MoreAt the same time as the Supreme Court took up the case, the Central Government became concerned about the Valley’s important mining activities. In the year 1983,
Explore MoreThe Shah Bano ruling drew a lot of criticism, with authority entities opposing the decision since it violated Islamic law requirements. However, the Supreme Court issued an unbiased judgment, restoring residents’ confidence and faith in the court.
Explore MoreThe topic of Union Judiciary has been dealt with in Chapter IV under Part V of the Constitution. The Supreme Court is dealt with in detail from articles 124 – 147.
Explore MoreThe Partnership Act of 1932 governs partnerships that are formed as a result of a contract. When the Partnership Act is silent, the partnership is governed by the Indian Contract Act’s general provisions.
Explore MoreD.K. Basu, Ashok K. Johri v. Province of West Bengal is a flawless pearl that filled in as a suggestion to the State of its obligation to defend the privileges, everything being equal, even the individuals who are captured or imprisoned.
Explore MoreTelephone tapping is an infringement on one of an individual’s most cherished possessions: privacy. The right to have a private telephonic conversation in the seclusion of one’s home or business, due to the rising development of extremely sophisticated technology, is susceptible to misuse.
Explore MoreThe Bihar Assembly Dissolution Case, also known as Rameshwar Prasad vs. Union of India, is a one-of-a-kind case that largely relates to the subject of Election Law and has opened the way for a more fair and transparent election process in India.
Explore MoreIn this example, the Supreme Court utilized the ‘Regulation of Public Trust.’ The hypothesis of public trust is an old lawful thought that states that some normal products, like streams, beaches, backwoods, and the air, are held in trust by the public authority for the overall population’s free and unlimited use.
Explore More