It is derived from State sovereignty and constitutes several features. It is the authority of the State over persons, property and events which are primarily within its territories.
Explore MoreThe court found that the facts on which India’s submission was based were not recognized by Portugal and that an investigation of British practice was needed to elucidate those facts and their legal consequences.
Explore MoreIn this case, the Attorney General, on behalf of the King, rejected the legal application filed by Westland Central Gold Mining Company Limited in June 1904.
Explore MoreThe Bank of Ethiopia was established in accordance with Ethiopian law in 1931. According to its constitution, a board of management would consist of ten members, six of whom would be chosen by the Ethiopian government, who will own six-tenths of the capital, and four by the holders of the remaining capital. It seems that the Ethiopian Empire had only one bank.
Explore MoreThis is the case of Luther v. Sagor. British citizen Luther used to run the timber business in Soviet Russia. On June 20, 1918, the Russian Soviet Government allegedly issued a decree stating, among other things. That the Russian Federative Republic was the owner of all mechanical sawmills operated by limited or private companies with a capital of more than 1,000,000 roubles. And all woodworking facilities outfitted with such machinery.
Explore MoreObligation to negotiate access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile) (2018) I.CJ. reports 2015, p.592 Brief of Facts of Bolivia v. Chile On 24 April […]
Explore MoreParties The Crown, Plaintiff M’Naghten, Defendant Facts In January 1843, in the parish of Saint Martin in Middlesex, Daniel M’Naghten stole a handgun and shot […]
Explore MoreThis appeal by special leave is directed by the high court of Himachal Pradesh, in this, the appellant has been convicted under section 376 of […]
Explore MoreA plot of agricultural land measuring approximately 8701 sq. meters in village Mota Varachha in Sub-district Surat was under restrictive tenure as per Section 73AA of the Land Revenue Code. As Plaintiff wanted to sell the land he filed an application before the C
Explore MoreTunda v. Rex, AIR 1950 All 95 Parties Tunda, Appellant Rex, Respondent Facts of Tunda vs. Rex The prosecution claimed that the appellant and Munshi […]
Explore MoreCopyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
