CASE NAME Thompson v. London, Midland and Scotland Railway Co. CITATION [1930] 1 KB 41 COURT Court of Appeal (England) BENCH Justices Sir John […]
Explore MoreCASE NAME ProCD, Inc. av. Matthew Zeidenberg and Silken Mountain Web Services, Inc. CITATION 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir., 1996) COURT United States Court […]
Explore MoreCASE NAME Kiran Bala v. B.P. Srivastava CITATION AIR 1982 SC 1523 COURT Supreme Court of India BENCH Justice R.S. Sarkaria and Justice A.N. […]
Explore MoreCASE NAME Kamisetti Subbiah v. Katha Venkataswamy CITATION (1903) 27 ILR Mad 355 COURT Madras High Court BENCH Justice Wallace and Justice Madhavan Nair APPELLANT […]
Explore MoreCASE NAME Holwell Securities Ltd. v Hughes CITATION [1974] 1 WLR 155, [1974] 1 All ER 161 COURT Court of Appeal of England and […]
Explore MoreCASE NAME Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya and Ors. CITATION 1959 AIR 781 COURT Supreme Court of India BENCH Subbarao, K. Imam, Syed Jaffer […]
Explore MoreCASE NAME Errington v. Errington and Woods CITATION [1952] 1 KB 290; [1951] EWCA Civ 2; [1952] 1 All ER 149;Â [1952] 1 TLR 231 […]
Explore MoreCASE NAME Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v. Higgins CITATION [1907] AC 367 COURT House of Lords BENCH Lords Macnaghten, Davey, and others APPELLANT […]
Explore MoreThe Patiala House Court ordered the registration of a FIR based on the second complaint. In response, Sony India Pvt. Ltd. and its counsel questioned the second complaint’s maintainability, claiming that
Explore MoreThe case raises critical issues about corporate governance, regulatory compliance, and accountability in India’s banking system. It also raises concerns about the enforcement of anti-corruption legislation and
Explore MoreCopyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
