The landmark judgment in State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh dealt with the highly debated issue under the Indian Constitution whether sub-classification amongst Scheduled Castes is permissible or not.
Category: Case Brief
Case Analysis: Abhilasha v. Prakash and Ors.
In the Supreme Court of India NAME OF THE CASE Abhilasha v. Prakash and Ors. CITATION Criminal Appeal No. 615 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.8260/2018) DATE OF JUDGEMENT September 15, 2020 APPELLANT Abhilasha RESPONDENT Prakash and Ors. BENCH /JUDGE ASHOK BHUSHAN J. M.R. SHAH J.; R. SUBHASH…
Case Analysis: P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (1998)
Supreme Court of India AIR 1998 SC 2120 NAME OF THE CASE P.V. Narsimha Rao v. State CITATION Appeal (crl.) 1207 of 1997 DATE OF JUDGEMENT April 17, 1998 APPELLANT P.V. Narasimha Rao RESPONDENT State (CBI/SPE) BENCH /JUDGE S.C. AGRAWAL & G.N.RAY & A.S. ANAND & S.P. BHARUCHA & S….
BILKIS BANO CASE: A SERIES OF UNFORTUNATE EVENTS
Eight of the 17 members of the Muslim group in Radhikpur village were found dead and six are missing. Only Bilkis, a man and a three-year-old child survived the attack.
CASE ANALYSIS OF DONOGHUE v. STEVENSON
The principle of negligence and the duty to care was established in the landmark judgment of Donoghue v. Stevenson in the realm of tort law.
Key Legal Cases: Right to Health and Education Cases | Landmark Judgments
The Right to Life, of course, cannot be upheld if every person is not given access to proper health and medical assistance. It is the most primary prerequisite to living a full life.
Aadhaar Card: Understanding Its Significance, Schemes, and Legal Status
The Aadhaar card includes a unique number that works as an identity proof and as an address proof in India. Earlier there were numerous cards to enjoy government subsidies, and benefits like driver’s license, voter ID, ration card which is now replaced by a single Aadhaar card.
Vishaka Case Analysis: Landmark Judgment on Workplace Sexual Harassment
The constitutional principles of equality and liberty have been upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the Vishaka Judgement.
Case Analysis |Pushpalatha vs. V. Padma & Ors.
The plaintiff, Pushpalatha N.V., filed an appeal against a decree by the trial court claiming a one-fifth part of the properties in the suit against one-twentieth part held by the trial court in A, B and E schedule properties, as C and D were misplaced under the Land Reforms Act.
Case Biref |Danamma @ Suman Surpur vs Amar
This landmark case definitely enhances women’s property rights and gender equality, especially given that daughters did not have an equal claim on ancestral property in India until recently.
Case Analysis |Carlill Vs Carbolic Smoke Ball Factory (1983)
Carlill vs. Carbolic the Smoke Ball case addressed whether an advertising company gimmick can be considered an express contractual promise to pay. Because the contract was made unilaterally, acceptance can be made without formal communication.
Case Brief |Boulton Vs Jones (1857)
The concept of an offer is considered to be one of the most exciting and at the same time complex tasks to deal with for a lawyer. It is one of the very basic first steps that a person trying to study law needs to understand.
Case Brief |Williams v Carwardine (1833)
The case of William vs Carwardine (1833) is a landmark English Case Law that briefs us with the key concept of the Law of Contracts where a contract comes into force through the offer of a reward.
THE BALCO JUDGEMENT |Analysis
The overall goal of the BALCO decision is to protect the future from previous incorrect and anachronistic rulings, as well as to encourage Indian courts to become more arbitration-friendly and thus less likely to participate in the arbitral phase, in accordance with the fundamental theory and ethos of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Rule.
Cas Brief |Visa International Ltd v Continental Resources (USA) Ltd
The court placed emphasis and provided a clear explanation of how it recognizes the parties’ arbitration agreement. This article is a case study of the same case that discusses each aspect in detail with critical analysis.
Case Analysis |Essar House v Arcellor Mittal
The judgment appears to clear up any confusion regarding the standards for granting interim protection under the Arbitration Act, particularly regarding whether the CPC 1908’s applicable level must be met before interim protection under the Arbitration Act is granted.
