Case Brief, Law Notes
Case Summary |MERRITT VS MERRITT
A husband and the wife got married in the year 1941. In the year 1949 they decided to purchase a building plot and later on built a house.
Case Brief
Case Brief, Law Notes
Case Brief |Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose
The case Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose is related to the minor agreement according to this any agreement with the minor is void ab-initio which means void from the beginning.
Case Brief, Law Notes
Case Brief |FISHER VS BELL
The respondent was the owner of a shop situated in The Arcade, Broadmead, at which premises he carried on business as a retail shopkeeper under the name of Bell’s Music Shop whereas the appellant was a chief inspector of police.
Case Brief, Law Notes
BROGDEN V METROPOLITAN RAILWAY COMPANY |Case Brief!
In 1877 there is a conflict occurred between the Brogden and metropolitan railway company which leads to them in a UK court to settle the dispute between them.
Case Brief, Law Notes
The Moorcock case explained!(1889)
The moorcock is a leading English case law which is related to the contract act, according to this case is related to the damage of the ship in the defendant jetty wharfingers.
Case Brief, Law Notes
Case Brief |A.K. Construction vs State of Jharkhand
That is A.K. Construction has a labour license for fifty workers, whereas Kaushik Construction has a labour license for a hundred workers.
Case Brief, Law Notes
Case Brief |Madho Ram vs The Secretary Of State For India
The sanction was duly recorded in the schedule to the tender, later on, that day the schedule was signed by the plaintiff and the Deputy Assistant Director of Supplies, communicated the acceptance of tender to the plaintiff.
Case Brief, Law Notes
Case Brief of Lalman Shukla vs Gauri Dutt
The case of Lalman Shukla V Gauri Dutt is a landmark Judgment in the history of the Indian Contract Act 1872 and support the principle of valid acceptance.
Case Brief, Law Notes
Case Brief |Krell v. Henry |Explained!
The case of Taylor v. Cardwell and The Moorcock were used to give the judgement. The defendant was not obligated to pay the rent even though the procession did not take place because, the purpose of renting the flat, which was to watch the coronation was frustrating.
Case Brief, Law Notes
Case Brief |Hyde v. Wrench |Explained!
Hyde v. Wrench is a landmark case, in the history of Contract Law. The case addresses the concept of specific performance of the initial offer in the event in which the first offer is rejected and a counteroffer is made.
