The case of Central Provinces Transport Services vs. Raghunath Gopal Patwardhan (1956) addresses a pivotal question in Indian labor law regarding the status of dismissed employees and the definition of “industrial disputes.”
Explore MoreThe case titled “Brahmo Samaj Educational Society And … vs West Bengal College Employee” was heard on 5 July 1963 and revolves around the legal status of educational institutions affiliated with the Calcutta University under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Explore MoreThe case of The Bata Shoe Co. (P) Ltd vs D. N. Ganguly & Others, decided on December 15, 1960, addresses issues related to an industrial dispute stemming from an illegal strike conducted by the company’s workers while a settlement was in effect.
Explore MoreThe case of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board vs. R. Rajappa & Others, decided on February 21, 1978, is a significant legal proceeding that addresses the intersection of employment law, administrative authority, and the definition of ‘industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Explore MoreThe case of Arkal Govind Raj Rao vs. Ciba Geigy of India Ltd. was adjudicated by the Supreme Court of India on May 6, 1985. The central issue in this case was the classification of Arkal Govind Raj Rao as a “workman” under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, following his termination from the company.
Explore MoreThe case “The Ahmedabad Textile Industry’s Research Association vs. The State of Bombay and Others” was presented before the Supreme Court of India and involves the legal status and classification of the Ahmedabad Textile Industry’s Research Association under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The case was decided on November 17, 1960, by a bench comprising Justices K.N. Wanchoo, P.B. Gajendragadkar, and A.K. Sarkar.
Explore MoreThe Supreme Court of India ruled on the case of “U.P. State Electricity Board v. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh & Anr. in 2004, which is a significant ruling regarding the legal status of apprentices employed under the Apprentices Act, 1961.
Explore MoreThe case of “Tncs. Corporation Ltd. vs S. Poomalai”, a decision by the Madras High Court dated March 11, 1994, discusses the pivotal features of contractual obligations, with emphasis on the breach of contract and the remedies offered to the party aggrieved
Explore MoreThe case of “S.M. Ghosh v. National Sheet and Metal Works, Ltd.,” decided on June 7, 1950, by the Calcutta High Court, is concerned with the interpretation and application of Section 12 of the “Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923
Explore MoreThis appeal, made to the honorable Rajasthan High Court, had been instituted in response to a judgment made by the Workmen Compensation Commissioner who was posted at Jodhpur. The judgment of the Commissioner had granted the pleading of Mst. Bhanwari, a widowed woman, was the widow of a dead workman named Gordhansingh, in the form of Rs. 7000 as compensation.
Explore MoreCopyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
