In the case of Syndicate Bank vs. K. Umesh Nayak, decided on 19 March 1994, the Supreme Court of India addressed significant issues regarding the entitlement of wages for employees participating in strikes
The case titled Steel Authority Of India Ltd. & Ors vs. National Union Water Front Workers & Ors, decided on August 30, 2001, deals with significant issues arising under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (CLRA Act), and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (I.D. Act).
The case “State of Madras vs C. P. Sarathy and Another” was adjudicated by the Supreme Court of India on December 5, 1952. It involves a legal dispute concerning industrial relations under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
The case “The State Of Bihar vs D. N. Ganguly & Others” was decided by the Supreme Court of India on August 22, 1958. The primary legal issue at hand was whether the appropriate government had the power to cancel or supersede a reference of an industrial dispute that was pending before an industrial tribunal, as per the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
The case of Poona Labour Union vs. State of Maharashtra (1969) addresses a labor dispute where the Poona Labour Union petitioned for a writ of mandamus to compel the State to refer their industrial dispute to a tribunal.
The landmark case People’s Union for Democratic Rights vs. Union of India & Others decided by the Supreme Court of India on 18th September 1982, stands as a defining moment in the evolution of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India.
The case of National Engineering Industries Limited vs. Shri Kishan Bhageria & Others (1987) addresses a fundamental question in labor law: whether an Internal Auditor qualifies as a “workman” under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
The case titled “Municipal Corporation Of Greater Bombay vs Labour Appellate Tribunal Of India” concerns a legal dispute that arose from disciplinary action taken against an employee of the Bombay Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (B.E.S.T.), part of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay.
In the case “Mangharam J.B. And Co. vs. Kher K.B. And Ors.”, a petition seeking a writ of quo warranto against K.B. Kher was submitted under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution.
The case “Management of Kairbetta Estate, Kotagiri vs. Rajamanickam and Others” was decided by the Supreme Court of India on March 24, 1960. The petition arose from an industrial dispute concerning the closure of a division of the Kairbetta Estate following violent disturbances by workers, which included an assault on the estate’s manager.
Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved with Legal Lock Journals LLP.
