In the case “Mangharam J.B. And Co. vs. Kher K.B. And Ors.”, a petition seeking a writ of quo warranto against K.B. Kher was submitted under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution.
The case “Management of Kairbetta Estate, Kotagiri vs. Rajamanickam and Others” was decided by the Supreme Court of India on March 24, 1960. The petition arose from an industrial dispute concerning the closure of a division of the Kairbetta Estate following violent disturbances by workers, which included an assault on the estate’s manager.
The case titled “The Management of Safdarjung Hospital vs. Kuldip Singh Sethi” addresses employment-related disputes within the context of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This judgment, delivered on January 1, 1970, by Chief Justice M. Hidayatullah and a bench of several other justices, involves multiple appeals concerning the classification of hospitals as industries and the rights of employees within these institutions.
The case “Secretary, Madras Gymkhana Club vs. Management of the Gymkhana Club” was decided by the Supreme Court of India on October 3, 1967. The main issue at hand was whether the Madras Gymkhana Club, a non-proprietary members’ club, could be classified as an ‘industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947.
In Indian Express Newspaper (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of West Bengal and Ors. (2005), the High Court of Calcutta addressed a jurisdictional dispute concerning which state government had authority to refer an industrial dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
The case “Hussainbhai, Calicut vs Alath Factory Thozhilali Union” was heard on July 28, 1978, and involved a dispute between a factory owner engaged in rope manufacturing and the workers represented by their union.
The case “Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd vs The Workmen And Ors” was heard by the Supreme Court of India on August 4, 1975. It concerns an industrial dispute that arose from the workings of Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL), a government-owned enterprise fully owned by the Central Government
The case “Excel Wear Etc vs Union Of India & Ors” concerns the constitutional validity of certain sections of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, specifically Sections 25(O) and 25(R).
The case of Dabur (Dr. S. K. Burman) Private Ltd. vs. The Workmen, decided on July 26, 1967, addresses an industrial dispute involving the employment status of certain workmen and the jurisdiction of the Labour Court.
The case of D. N. Banerji vs P. R. Mukherjee And Others is a landmark Supreme Court judgment delivered on December 5, 1952, that significantly expanded the understanding of what constitutes an “industry” under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
