Hindu Succession Act: Key Principles & Inheritance Rules
INTRODUCTION
The law of succession in India are primarily religion based, and to decide the applicability of an enactment, what the religion of the deceased was, is the first and the foremost question. As the title of the Act suggests, the Hindu Succession Act would apply to Hindus.
The foundational principle of Hindu inheritance comes from Manu’s assertion: “Sons take the property to the nearest sapinda.” The inheritance then passes to the next eligible heir.
Before the Hindu Succession Act of 1956, the Mitakshara system followed the principle of propinquity for succession. The Dayabhaga system, however, relied on the principle of religious efficacy.
The Hindu Succession Act of 1956 introduced distinct succession schemes for male and female intestates. It also included specific rules for Hindus under the Marumakkattayam and Aliyasantana laws.
The application of these inheritance laws depends on multiple factors, including the deceased’s religion and sect. Other factors include their sex, domicile, scheduled tribal community status, and type of marriage.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES RELATING TO SUCCESSION
Section 18
Sections 18 to 28 of the Hindu Succession Act provide the general provisions relating to succession. As per Section 18 of the Hindu Succession Act, heirs related to an intestate by full blood are given precedence over those related by half-blood when all other factors regarding their relationship are identical. This rule ensures that individuals with a closer blood relationship are favored over those with a more distant connection.
Section 19
As per Section 19 of the Act, when two or more heirs inherit together from an intestate, they share the property on an equal per capita basis, rather than per stirpes, unless explicitly stated otherwise in the Act. They also hold the property as tenants-in-common, meaning each heir has a distinct share of the property, rather than as joint tenants with undivided rights.
Section 20
A child who is in the womb at the time of an intestate’s death and is born alive afterward is granted the same rights of inheritance as if the child had been born before the intestate’s death. This provision enshrined in Section 20 ensures that the inheritance rights are retroactively applied from the date of the intestate’s death.
Section 21
According to Section 21, in situations where two individuals die simultaneously under circumstances that make it unclear who survived whom, it is assumed, unless proven otherwise, that the younger person survived the elder. This presumption helps resolve uncertainties in the distribution of property.
Section 22
As Section 22 outlines, after the Hindu Succession Act came into effect, if a property or business of an intestate devolves to two or more Class I heirs and one of them wishes to transfer their interest, the remaining Class I heirs have a preferential right to purchase the interest. The value for this interest, if not agreed upon by the parties, will be determined by the court. If multiple Class I heirs wish to acquire the interest, the one offering the highest consideration will be given preference. The term “court” refers to the jurisdiction where the property is located or the business operates, as well as any court specified by the State Government.
Individuals who commit or abet murder are disqualified from inheriting any property from the person murdered or from any other property related to the murder. This rule aims to prevent those who engage in criminal acts from benefiting from their wrongdoing.
Section 26 to 29
If a Hindu converts to another religion, their descendants born after the conversion are disqualified from inheriting the property of their Hindu relatives, unless these descendants are Hindus at the time the succession opens. Thus Section 26 ensures that inheritance remains within the Hindu community. If an heir is disqualified, the property is treated as if they predeceased the intestate. Section 27 ensures property distribution follows the Act’s rules, unaffected by the disqualification.
No individual will be disqualified from inheriting property due to any disease, defect, or deformity. Additionally, unless otherwise specified in the Act, no other grounds will disqualify a person from succession. Section 28 upholds the principle that personal physical conditions should not impact inheritance rights.
As per Section 29, if an intestate leaves no qualified heirs, the property escheats to the Government. The Government assumes ownership along with all obligations and liabilities applicable to an heir. This provision ensures that property does not remain unclaimed or improperly managed.
CONCLUSION
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, marks a major shift in India’s inheritance law. It creates a structured and equitable property distribution framework for Hindus. Rooted in Manu’s principle of prioritizing close blood relations, the Act modernizes traditions. It provides clear guidelines for both male and female intestates. Sections 18 to 29 address various inheritance scenarios, including preferences based on blood relations and equal sharing among heirs.
Key principles include the preferential right of full-blood heirs and equal distribution among co-heirs. The Act also grants retroactive rights to children born posthumously. It ensures justice by disqualifying individuals involved in criminal acts or religious conversion from inheritance. It upholds the rights of individuals with disabilities. The Act includes an escheat provision for cases where no qualified heirs exist. These provisions maintain fairness, blending traditional values with contemporary legal standards.
