This is a case analysis of Kulbhushan Jadhav Case. It talks about the facts, arguments and judgement of this case. This article gives a legal analysis of the stands of both India and Pakistan. It discusses what ICJ observed in this case.
It is derived from State sovereignty and constitutes several features. It is the authority of the State over persons, property and events which are primarily within its territories.
The court found that the facts on which India’s submission was based were not recognized by Portugal and that an investigation of British practice was needed to elucidate those facts and their legal consequences.
In this case, the Attorney General, on behalf of the King, rejected the legal application filed by Westland Central Gold Mining Company Limited in June 1904.
The Bank of Ethiopia was established in accordance with Ethiopian law in 1931. According to its constitution, a board of management would consist of ten members, six of whom would be chosen by the Ethiopian government, who will own six-tenths of the capital, and four by the holders of the remaining capital. It seems that the Ethiopian Empire had only one bank.
This is the case of Luther v. Sagor. British citizen Luther used to run the timber business in Soviet Russia. On June 20, 1918, the Russian Soviet Government allegedly issued a decree stating, among other things. That the Russian Federative Republic was the owner of all mechanical sawmills operated by limited or private companies with a capital of more than 1,000,000 roubles. And all woodworking facilities outfitted with such machinery.
Obligation to negotiate access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile) (2018) I.CJ. reports 2015, p.592 Brief of Facts of Bolivia
Brain-mapping works by measuring the electrical potential difference, which arises due to the neuronal activity of the brain. Our brain reacts differently to various events. how it reacts to familiar events is different from how it reacts to unknown events. The method used in India is also called the P-300 waves test.Â
Article 17 abolishes Untouchability and its practice in any form. The practice of it will be considered an offense and will be punishable. The word Untouchability is defined nowhere in the Constitution.
Parties The Crown, Plaintiff M’Naghten, Defendant Facts In January 1843, in the parish of Saint Martin in Middlesex, Daniel M’Naghten
Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
