A dedicated planning effort, adherence to several important guiding principles, and an effective communications approach may significantly improve court security.
Start-ups will be given up to Rs. 50 lakhs in convertible debentures or debt-linked instruments to help them enter the market commercialise their products or scale-up. It will aid in the development of a vibrant start-up environment in Tier 2 and Tier 3 regions, as smaller towns in India are frequently underfunded.Â
Schools, colleges, universities, and communities must play an active part in educating their students about the prevalence of cyberbullying and the various safety measures and channels.
There should also be an improvement in the management of hearings and witnesses. Only when these two efforts will be conflated, then can we achieve a properly functioning judicial system of India.
In simple words, Judicial Separation is different from Divorce. Divorce puts the relationship to an end and all the rights and obligations of both the spouses cease to exist. However, judicial separation merely suspends marital rights and duties for a specific period.
The origin of it traces back to the era of the British empire when their Constitution was not written in the 1600s. The then Chief Justice Coke said that if any law made by the Parliament is against the principle of common law and reason then the Court has the power to review it and declare it Void.
The Maneka Gandhi case has the term Personal liberty widest possible interpretation and giving effect to the intention of the drafters of the Constitution. This case also extended the protection of Article 14 to the Personal liberty of every citizen.Â
India has a parliamentary form of government, a reminder of British rule. There are two Houses of Parliament in India and then there is the President. These comprise the Indian Parliament.
Nandini Satpathy is a former Chief Minister of Orissa and one-time minister at the national level. A complaint was filed against her by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance, under section 179 IPC before the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate Sadar, Cuttack.
In this case, the court established new jurisprudence about known as the basic structure doctrine. In 1967, the Supreme Court ruled that India’s Parliament could not abridge any of the fundamental rights set out in the country’s constitution.
Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
