That is A.K. Construction has a labour license for fifty workers, whereas Kaushik Construction has a labour license for a hundred workers.
The sanction was duly recorded in the schedule to the tender, later on, that day the schedule was signed by the plaintiff and the Deputy Assistant Director of Supplies, communicated the acceptance of tender to the plaintiff.Â
The case of Lalman Shukla V Gauri Dutt is a landmark Judgment in the history of the Indian Contract Act 1872 and support the principle of valid acceptance.
The case of Taylor v. Cardwell and The Moorcock were used to give the judgement. The defendant was not obligated to pay the rent even though the procession did not take place because, the purpose of renting the flat, which was to watch the coronation was frustrating.
Hyde v. Wrench is a landmark case, in the history of Contract Law. The case addresses the concept of specific performance of the initial offer in the event in which the first offer is rejected and a counteroffer is made.
From 25th April 2008 to 13th April 2011, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited (SHICL) floated an issue of Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures (OFCDs) and started collecting subscriptions from investors.
The system of dowry, a legacy of a no longer relevant historical practice, indelibly shapes the pervasiveness of gender inequity in Indian society, where women have been devalued as simply objects and goods to be monetarily valued.
Bachan Singh, the appellant, her wife was murdered and he was found guilty and sentenced to life in jail. The appellant was living with his cousin Hukam Singh and his family after serving his jail sentence (i.e., after his release).
This is a case analysis of the famous H.H. Mahara Jadilla Jamadavra Ojiba Jirao Cindia Bahadur in Gwariel and Ors. Against the Dominion of India and Anne. Commonly referred to as the secret purse case, the special privileges granted to traditional rulers were discussed in this regard.
Hussainara Khatoon & Ors. was a landmark decision ruled on March 9, 1979, that gave broader meaning to Article 21 and stated that everyone has the right to a prompt trial. It is the most well-known case involving the human rights of Indian inmates.
Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
