Tag: Golaknath v. State of Punjab

case brief, case summary

Case Brief |Golaknath vs. State of Punjab

 LEGAL LOCK ADMIN  18/02/2022  2 Comments on Case Brief |Golaknath vs. State of Punjab

In this case, the court established new jurisprudence about known as the basic structure doctrine. In 1967, the Supreme Court ruled that India’s Parliament could not abridge any of the fundamental rights set out in the country’s constitution.

Article -13 |Justiciability of Fundamental Rights

 LEGAL LOCK ADMIN  31/01/2022  0 Comments on Article -13 |Justiciability of Fundamental Rights

Indian Constitution is a Supreme. It means ‘Supremacy of the Constitution i.e., all laws must be in accordance with the provisions of Constitution.

supreme court: legal l ock

“Is The 24th And 25th Amendment Valid?

 LEGAL LOCK ADMIN  21/07/2021  0 Comments on “Is The 24th And 25th Amendment Valid?

the Kesavananda Bharati case brought in a new transition in the basic principles such as the rights of a citizen towards the fundamental right.

Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala

 LEGAL LOCK ADMIN  19/07/2021  0 Comments on Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala

Kesavananda Bharati vs State Of Kerala(1973) also known as the fundamental right case. it is considered one of the most significant cases in history.

legal lock

BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION: Article 13!

 LEGAL LOCK ADMIN  19/07/2021  0 Comments on BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION: Article 13!

Can Constitutional Amendment is “law”? This question seems very easy, but every easy question doesn’t guarantee to be simple as well.