Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA): Key Provisions and Cases

By Vaidehi Sharma, a student of BALLB at Mohanlal Sukhadia University

Introduction

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) is one of the strong legislative instruments in India that combats the widespread evil of money laundering. The PMLA, as enacted by Parliament due to international obligations under the FATF and UN conventions, addresses the complex concerns of laundering and other associated offenses. Money laundering, which involves disguising illicitly obtained money as legitimate income, not only undermines financial systems but also facilitates other criminal activities, including terrorism and drug trafficking. Recognizing its adverse impact, the Indian government adopted the PMLA as a comprehensive measure to trace, confiscate, and penalize such offenses.

This article overviews the Act’s key provisions and highlights landmark cases that have shaped its interpretation and application.

Objective and Scope of the PMLA

The main goal of the PMLA is to prevent and control money laundering, as well as confiscate and seize any property derived from illegal means. The Act also intends to promote international cooperation in the investigation and prosecution of money laundering offenses.

PMLA is extended to the whole country and applies to all persons, companies, and associations of persons, regardless of their domicile or jurisdiction of operation. It also ensures compliance with India’s commitments to international bodies such as the FATF.

Key Provisions of the PMLA

Definition of Money Laundering

Money laundering involves activities or processes aimed at projecting or claiming proceeds of crime as untainted property. It covers the concealment, possession, acquisition, or use of such proceeds and their conversion or transfer to disguise their illicit origin.

Predicate Offenses and Schedule of Offenses

PMLA is based on predicate offenses scheduled in it. It includes crimes under the Indian Penal Code, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the Companies Act, etc. The Act applies only when such predicate offenses yield proceeds of crime.

Attachment, Confiscation, and Seizure

The act provides for attachment. confiscation and seizure of property and documents in case of default. The authorities may attach the property suspected to be proceeds of crime provisionally for 180 days to avoid the dissipation and diversion of assets during the investigation. After conviction, the state shall confiscate the properties involved in money laundering.

Even the Enforcement Directorate officers are empowered to search and seize documents and properties related to the offense.

Reporting Entities and KYC Norms

Financial institutions, banks, intermediaries, and other reporting entities are required to:

Maintain records of transactions exceeding prescribed thresholds.
Verify the identity of clients (KYC norms).
Furnish information to the Financial Intelligence Unit-India (FIU-IND).

For more details refer: https://thelegallock.com/final/analysing-the-position-of-the-prevention-of-money-laundering-act-2002-in-combating-financial-crimes-in-india/

Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Tribunal

The act also provides for adjudicating Authorities and appellate tribunals. The adjudicating authority reviews evidence placed before it by the ED and finds out whether properties are laundered money whereas the appeals against decisions of the Adjudicating Authority can be made to the Appellate Tribunal, providing a mechanism for judicial review.

Punishments

The Act prescribes rigorous imprisonment for 3 to 7 years and fines for money laundering offenses varying on the degree and gravity of the offense. If the predicate offense is linked to narcotics, the imprisonment may extend up to 10 years.

International Cooperation

PMLA provides mutual legal assistance and exchange of information with foreign jurisdictions in pursuit of cross-border money laundering investigations and prosecutions.

Amendment of the PMLA

Through time, PMLA has been amended numerous times to stiffen the framework further:

2005 Amendment: Sought for Improved procedural clarification and incorporated more predicate crimes. The 2005 amendment act particularly added a new definition of ‘investigation’ in the definition clause and substituted the words ‘terms and conditions of service (including tenure of office) in place of terms and conditions of service.
2009 Amendment: It expanded the meaning of “proceeds of crime” to include property derived directly or indirectly from crime committed or attempted, including properties located outside India, to counter cross-border money laundering. The amendment also extended the scope of reporting entities like banks and financial intermediaries and tightened their compliance and reporting obligations. Also it, therefore, strengthened the adversarial process, ensuring it was quicker to resolve or confiscate illicit assets through international cooperation in investigating or prosecuting transnational money laundering offenses.
2012 Amendment: It further expanded its scope by incorporating new predicate offenses and allowing retrospective application, thereby permitting prosecution for offenses committed before the Act came into force in the event of such offenses having generated proceeds of crime. It also strengthened the Enforcement Directorate by streamlining the procedure for attachment and confiscation of properties and by making certain offenses non-compoundable.
2019 Amendment: This further strengthened its provisions. Firstly, it clarified that money laundering, in itself is an offense independent of the conviction about predicate offenses. Expansion of the Enforcement Directorate has been made and it grants increased authority in attachment of property, search, as well as seizure. Not Bailable Money laundering offenses have made it clear with strict implications relating to non-compliance under Reporting entities. This has set investigation a way easy making accountability better for India when compared against economic crimes.
2023 Amendment: Recently the act has been amended in 2023 to include practicing-chartered accountants (CA), company secretaries (CS), and cost and works accountants (CWA) within the scope of the act who conduct financial transactions on behalf of their clients. This was done in response to the Chinese app scam.

Key Cases Under PMLA

Hasan Ali Khan Case (2011)

The case of Hasan Ali Khan is one of the earliest high-profile ones under PMLA, where charges are framed for laundering nearly billion dollars through foreign bank accounts. This case highlighted procedural issues like obtaining evidence from abroad and emphasized the need for robust international cooperation.

Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi Scam, 2018

The Punjab National Bank scam exposed a massive fraud involving diamond merchants Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi. The ED attached properties worth thousands of crores under PMLA, reinforcing the Act’s utility in tackling financial fraud.

Vijay Mallya Case (2016)

The case of Vijay Mallya, which involved unpaid loans and alleged laundering of funds, was a test for India’s extradition and asset recovery mechanisms under PMLA. The action taken by the ED in attaching properties reflected its proactive approach to high-profile economic offenses.

INX Media Case (2019)

This case involved allegations of illegal foreign funding received by INX Media. The ED invoked PMLA to investigate and attach properties related to the accused, which included some prominent political figures.

Challenges in Implementation of the Provisions of PMLA

The most challenging hurdle is the outlay of overlapping jurisdictions, the interplay between PMLA and other laws, such as the Companies Act and the Income Tax Act, often leads to jurisdictional ambiguities and delays. Further, the implementation is delayed because of procedural issues including the process of attaching and confiscating properties is often time-consuming.

Also, stringent compliance requirements place significant operational and financial burdens on banks and intermediaries.

Critics say that the wide powers given to ED under PMLA are sometimes misused for political vendettas and harassment of individuals.

Importance of PMLA in the International Context

PMLA brings India’s anti-money laundering regime to international standards. It allows India to comply with FATF recommendations, increasing India’s credibility in international financial systems. Moreover, it helps in strengthening India’s ability to fight terror financing, an essential component of international security.

Recommendations for Reform

Streamlining Processes: Simplification of adjudication and appellate processes can reduce delays in adjudication and investigation.
Strengthening Judicial Oversight: Ensuring a balance between powers of investigation and individual rights can address allegations of misuse.
International Cooperation: Stronger relations with foreign jurisdictions can ensure better sharing of evidence and asset recovery.
Capacity Building: Training of financial institutions and investigative agencies can improve compliance and enforcement.

Conclusion

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act stands at the foundation in the fight against financial crimes by the Indian system, considering that it targets the activities of laundering which has deep-rooted economic and social effects. The provisions and amendments, as observed, have greatly enhanced the anti-money laundering framework; however, implementation and the eradication of procedural challenges stand as major issues.

India thus emphasizes the fact that the act of maintaining a transparent and accountable financial system is essential for its operations. Continuous reforms, better judicial oversight, and capacity building can ensure that PMLA continues to be a good tool for safeguarding India’s financial integrity and checking economic offenses. In a world becoming increasingly more interconnected through financial systems, the PMLA is going to continue to be a key player in terms of providing justice and preventing crime activity.