Tunda v. Rex, AIR 1950 All 95 Parties Tunda, Appellant Rex, Respondent Facts of Tunda vs. Rex The prosecution claimed that the appellant and Munshi enjoyed wrestling and that on the morning of May 13, 1947, the appellant invited Munshi to the akhara in Kanhaiya’s bagichi for a wrestling match….
Category: Law Notes
HUGHES Vs. METROPOLITAN RAILWAY COMPANY
HUGHES V METROPOLITAN RAILWAY COMPANY (1877) This case was a occur in the year of 1877 in the House Of Loads. PARTIES Appellant:- Thomas Hughes Respondent :- Metropolitan railway company FACTS IN CASE The Thomas Hughes who owned his property on lease to the metropolitan railway company at 216 euston…
State of Maharashtra vs. Prakash and Anr
State of Maharashtra v. Prakash and Anr, AIR 1992 SC 1275 Parties State of Maharashtra, Appellant Prakash, Respondent Facts of State of Maharashtra vs. Prakash and Anr. Nirmala (PW-1) was born and raised in Pathrot village, where her parents still lived. She was married to PW-2, a villager from Dahegaon….
Republic of Italy vs. Union of India
Republic of Italy v Union of India Citation: (2013) 9 SC 89 Bench: Altamas Kabir CJI, Anil R Dave, Vikramajit Sen JJ FACTS OF THE CASE The incident took place on 15th February 2012, when MV Enrica Lexie, an Italian flagged shipping vessel was on its way to Djibouti. It…
PRIVILEGE COMMUNICATION (S.121 to 125)
What is a privilege communication? There are certain cases wherein the witness cannot be compelled to disclose any fact. And even if he wants to disclose he is not allowed to disclose that fact that communication is privileged communication. Any witness whether husband or wife, and official communication, related to…
SEBI VS SUBRATA BHATTACHARYA AND ORS
FACTS OF CASE: On 30th September 2009, (a real estate venture of Sahara India) filed a red herring prospectus for was submitted to SEBI for approval for its IPO. At the time of analysis of DRHP of SEBI Sahara Prime City, SEBI noticed unusual fundraising activity in the 2 firms-…
Basanti Bai vs Prafulla Routrai & Ors
Smt. Basanti Bai vs Sri Prafulla Kumar Routrai And Ors By: Viraj Khemani Citations: 101 (2006) CLT 685 Bench: A Parichha FACTS OF BASANTI BAI V. PRAFULLA ROUTRAI & ORS.: The plaintiff desired to purchase a plot from the defendant for constructing a house. But later finding he found that…
TULSIDAS KHANOLKAR Vs. STATE OF GOA
TULSIDAS KHANOLKAR V STATE OF GOA By: Pragya Jain The case is related to a charge on doctor for molesting a female patient on clinic . FACT OF TULSIDAS KHANOLKAR Vs. STATE OF GOA The incident in which allegation occur to a doctor in 2016, which lead to a suspension…
Hardesh Ores Pvt. Ltd vs M/S. Hede And Company
The agreement was to commence on January 01, 1997, but on 12.12.1996 but an order of the Supreme Court dated 12.12.1996 prohibited mining operations in the authorized area, so mining operations could not be commenced.
Bhupinder Singh vs. U.T. of Chandigarh
The post is the case brief of Bhupinder Singh v. U.T. of Chandigarh, as a part of important judgement of section 375 of IPC.
All you must know about Quasi Contract
A quasi-contract is a retroactive agreement between two parties who have no prior commitments to each other. A court creates it to remedy a situation in which one party gains something at the expense of the other.
HIND CONSTRUCTION Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
In this case, a contractor takes a contract for making the bank canal near a landi river near Nasik value of Rs. 107000 from the state of Maharashtra
A brief on Doctrine of Separate Legal Entity
Introduction The Doctrine of Separate Legal Entity is a principle that allows a corporation to be considered a “legal person.” It establishes the firm as a separate legal entity from its owner. It indicates that the owner and the corporation are two separate legal entities that can be held separately…
What law says about Representations and Warranties
Introduction A Representation is a statement of truth on which the receiving party relies to convince them to engage in the contract. It is usually stated before the contract, but it may also be stated in the contract When a misleading representation is made, a party may file a claim…
Doctrine of Imputability/State Responsibility
Introduction When one state performs an internationally unlawful act against another, it incurs state responsibility. Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, for example, bans authoritarian non-intervention by saying that every State is legally obligated not to use or threaten to use force against others. Non-intervention, on the other hand, is…
All you need to know of Habeas Corpus Wrip with case laws!
INTRODUCTION The makers of the Indian Constitution under Part III had provided Indian citizens with six fundamental rights to protect them from any kind of malpractices undertaken by those in power which means from the State. Article 32 has the provision of the Right to Constitutional Remedies. It gives citizens…