Case Brief of Lalman Shukla vs Gauri Dutt
The case of Lalman Shukla V Gauri Dutt is a landmark Judgment in the history of the Indian Contract Act 1872 and support the principle of valid acceptance.
Explore MoreArchive
Home Category: Case Brief
The case of Lalman Shukla V Gauri Dutt is a landmark Judgment in the history of the Indian Contract Act 1872 and support the principle of valid acceptance.
Explore MoreThe case of Taylor v. Cardwell and The Moorcock were used to give the judgement. The defendant was not obligated to pay the rent even though the procession did not take place because, the purpose of renting the flat, which was to watch the coronation was frustrating.
Explore MoreHyde v. Wrench is a landmark case, in the history of Contract Law. The case addresses the concept of specific performance of the initial offer in the event in which the first offer is rejected and a counteroffer is made.
Explore MoreFrom 25th April 2008 to 13th April 2011, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited (SHICL) floated an issue of Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures (OFCDs) and started collecting subscriptions from investors.
Explore MoreThe system of dowry, a legacy of a no longer relevant historical practice, indelibly shapes the pervasiveness of gender inequity in Indian society, where women have been devalued as simply objects and goods to be monetarily valued.
Explore MoreBachan Singh, the appellant, her wife was murdered and he was found guilty and sentenced to life in jail. The appellant was living with his cousin Hukam Singh and his family after serving his jail sentence (i.e., after his release).
Explore MoreThis is a case analysis of the famous H.H. Mahara Jadilla Jamadavra Ojiba Jirao Cindia Bahadur in Gwariel and Ors. Against the Dominion of India and Anne. Commonly referred to as the secret purse case, the special privileges granted to traditional rulers were discussed in this regard.
Explore MoreHussainara Khatoon & Ors. was a landmark decision ruled on March 9, 1979, that gave broader meaning to Article 21 and stated that everyone has the right to a prompt trial. It is the most well-known case involving the human rights of Indian inmates.
Explore MoreSunil Batra v. Delhi Administration & Others is a significant case in our legal history that helped to safeguard the fundamental rights of prisoners. It was unusual in a number of respects, one of which was that the petitioner was a death row inmate, which was unheard of at the time.
Explore MoreThis case established that where public officials are engaged and the subject involves a breach of fundamental rights or the execution of public duties, the matter falls within Public Law rather than Private Law.
Explore MoreCopyright © 2025. All rights reserved.
